Sustainability practices, board’s gender diversity and quota regulations in European markets

Abstract The ubiquitous debate on sustainability practices and the development of a uniform regulation on the use of gender quotas to be implemented in all EU countries by mid-2026 puts these matters in the spotlight. We link both topics by studying the effects board gender diversity and use of gender quota regulations on the firm’s adoption of sustainability practices. Using a panel of listed firms from 22 European countries over the period 2009–2018, we find that firms with gender diverse boards present higher Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance (ESG) scores while the use of quotas attenuates this positive role played by female directors. Our results are robust across econometric models that control for endogeneity. Contrarily to the notion of tokenism, we also find that that the positive effect of gender diversity is observable from the very first female board member. The positive effect of female directors on the firms’ ESG scores correspond to non-executives. Altogether, our results call for further debate on the implementation of positive gender diversity policies, specially concerning the use of quotas with sanctions for non-complaints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Managerial Science
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-025-00846-5
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainability practices, board’s gender diversity and quota regulations in European markets

Carlos Fernández, Rubén Arrondo García, Ana Rosa Fonseca-Díaz
3 citations
Review of Managerial Science
Gender Diversity and Inequality
11.60
article

Sustainability practices, board’s gender diversity and quota regulations in European markets

Carlos Fernández, Rubén Arrondo García, Ana Rosa Fonseca-Díaz
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract The ubiquitous debate on sustainability practices and the development of a uniform regulation on the use of gender quotas to be implemented in all EU countries by mid-2026 puts these matters in the spotlight. We link both topics by studying the effects board gender diversity and use of gender quota regulations on the firm’s adoption of sustainability practices. Using a panel of listed firms from 22 European countries over the period 2009–2018, we find that firms with gender diverse boards present higher Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance (ESG) scores while the use of quotas attenuates this positive role played by female directors. Our results are robust across econometric models that control for endogeneity. Contrarily to the notion of tokenism, we also find that that the positive effect of gender diversity is observable from the very first female board member. The positive effect of female directors on the firms’ ESG scores correspond to non-executives. Altogether, our results call for further debate on the implementation of positive gender diversity policies, specially concerning the use of quotas with sanctions for non-complaints.

Review of Managerial ScienceVol. 19(10)
Universidad de Oviedo (ES)
Gobierno del Principado de Asturias, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
11.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.