Effect of gaseous ozone treatment on cells and biofilm of dairy Bacillus spp. isolates

<i>Bacillus</i> spp. can produce biofilms and cause recurrent contamination in the food industry. The common clean-in-place (CIP) method is usually employed in sanitizing processing equipment. However, CIP is not always effective in removing biofilms. Ozone represents a promising "green" alternative to control biofilms. In this study, the effect of gaseous ozone (50 ppm) was evaluated <i>in vitro</i> against planktonic and sessile <i>B. cereus</i> and <i>B. subtilis</i> isolates collected from the dairy sector. Planktonic cells were enumerated by plate counts after 10 min, 1 h, and 6 h of ozone treatment. After a short-term (10 min) exposure, a slight reduction in microbial loads (0.66-2.27 ± 0.15 Log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL) was observed for <i>B. cereus</i> strains, whereas a more pronounced reduction (2.90-3.81 ± 0.12 Log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL) was noted in <i>B. subtilis</i> isolates. The microbial load further decreased after 1 h-treatments, around 1.5-3.46 ± 0.11 Log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL for <i>B. cereus</i> strains, and 4.0-5.6 ± 0.11 Log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL for <i>B. subtilis</i> isolates, until complete inactivation of bacterial cells after 6 h of exposure. Moreover, the effect of gaseous ozone treatment (50 ppm, 6 h) was evaluated for its ability to inhibit and eradicate biofilms formed on two common food-contact materials (polystyrene and stainless steel). Sessile <i>B. subtilis</i> cells were the more sensitive to the action of ozone, while a weak effect was highlighted on <i>B. cereus</i> isolates on both surface types. These results were further confirmed by scanning microscopy analysis. The number of cells in the biofilm state was also assessed, showing a not-complete correlation with a decrease in Biofilm Production Indices (BPIs). These findings highlighted the effectiveness of the sanitizing protocol using gaseous ozone in contrasting Bacillus free-living cells, but a not completely counteraction in biofilm formation (inhibition) or eradication of pre-formed biofilm. Thus, the application of ozone could be thought of not alone, but in combination with common sanitization practices to improve their effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Microbiology
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1538456
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Microbial Inactivation Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of gaseous ozone treatment on cells and biofilm of dairy Bacillus spp. isolates

Patrizia Morra, Maria Teresa Bottero, Emanuele Costa, Angela Maria Catania et al.
2 citations
Frontiers in Microbiology
Microbial Inactivation Methods
2.47
article

Effect of gaseous ozone treatment on cells and biofilm of dairy Bacillus spp. isolates

Patrizia Morra, Maria Teresa Bottero, Emanuele Costa, Angela Maria Catania, Pierluigi Aldo Di Ciccio, Alessandra Dalmasso
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<i>Bacillus</i> spp. can produce biofilms and cause recurrent contamination in the food industry. The common clean-in-place (CIP) method is usually employed in sanitizing processing equipment. However, CIP is not always effective in removing biofilms. Ozone represents a promising "green" alternative to control biofilms. In this study, the effect of gaseous ozone (50 ppm) was evaluated <i>in vitro</i> against planktonic and sessile <i>B. cereus</i> and <i>B. subtilis</i> isolates collected from the dairy sector. Planktonic cells were enumerated by plate counts after 10 min, 1 h, and 6 h of ozone treatment. After a short-term (10 min) exposure, a slight reduction in microbial loads (0.66-2.27 ± 0.15 Log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL) was observed for <i>B. cereus</i> strains, whereas a more pronounced reduction (2.90-3.81 ± 0.12 Log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL) was noted in <i>B. subtilis</i> isolates. The microbial load further decreased after 1 h-treatments, around 1.5-3.46 ± 0.11 Log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL for <i>B. cereus</i> strains, and 4.0-5.6 ± 0.11 Log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL for <i>B. subtilis</i> isolates, until complete inactivation of bacterial cells after 6 h of exposure. Moreover, the effect of gaseous ozone treatment (50 ppm, 6 h) was evaluated for its ability to inhibit and eradicate biofilms formed on two common food-contact materials (polystyrene and stainless steel). Sessile <i>B. subtilis</i> cells were the more sensitive to the action of ozone, while a weak effect was highlighted on <i>B. cereus</i> isolates on both surface types. These results were further confirmed by scanning microscopy analysis. The number of cells in the biofilm state was also assessed, showing a not-complete correlation with a decrease in Biofilm Production Indices (BPIs). These findings highlighted the effectiveness of the sanitizing protocol using gaseous ozone in contrasting Bacillus free-living cells, but a not completely counteraction in biofilm formation (inhibition) or eradication of pre-formed biofilm. Thus, the application of ozone could be thought of not alone, but in combination with common sanitization practices to improve their effectiveness.

Frontiers in MicrobiologyVol. 16
University of Turin (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Microbial Inactivation Methods
2.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.