Dynamical Models of the Milky Way in Action Space with LAMOST DR8 and Gaia EDR3

Abstract This work explores dynamical models of the Milky Way (MW) by analyzing a sample of 86,109 K giant stars selected through cross-matching the LAMOST DR8 and Gaia EDR3 surveys. Our earlier torus models of Q. Wang et al. did not include Gaia data, making them incompatible with the new sample’s proper motion distributions. Here, we refine the construction of action-based, self-consistent models to constrain the three-dimensional velocity distribution of K giants over a larger parameter space, drawing on a series of existing MW models. This approach produces several new MW models. Our best-fit model for the local kinematics near the Sun indicates an MW virial mass of 1.35 × 10 12 M ⊙ , a local stellar density of 0.0696 M ⊙ pc −3 , and a local dark matter density of 0.0115 M ⊙ pc −3 . Our main conclusion supports a thicker and more extended thick disk, alongside a cooler thin disk, compared to the best-fitting model of Q. Wang et al. Near the Sun, our model aligns well with observations, but it is less satisfactory at distances far from the Galactic center, perhaps implying unidentified structures. Further high-precision observations will be critical for understanding the dynamics in these outer Galactic regions and will require a more realistic model.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/adb57e
Primary Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamical Models of the Milky Way in Action Space with LAMOST DR8 and Gaia EDR3

Guang-Chen Sun, Shude Mao, R. J. Long, Xuelei Chen et al.
The Astrophysical Journal
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
article

Dynamical Models of the Milky Way in Action Space with LAMOST DR8 and Gaia EDR3

Guang-Chen Sun, Shude Mao, R. J. Long, Xuelei Chen, Yougang Wang, Ping-Jie Ding, Xin Zhang, Qiao Wang, Yichao Li
article en

Abstract

Abstract This work explores dynamical models of the Milky Way (MW) by analyzing a sample of 86,109 K giant stars selected through cross-matching the LAMOST DR8 and Gaia EDR3 surveys. Our earlier torus models of Q. Wang et al. did not include Gaia data, making them incompatible with the new sample’s proper motion distributions. Here, we refine the construction of action-based, self-consistent models to constrain the three-dimensional velocity distribution of K giants over a larger parameter space, drawing on a series of existing MW models. This approach produces several new MW models. Our best-fit model for the local kinematics near the Sun indicates an MW virial mass of 1.35 × 10 12 M ⊙ , a local stellar density of 0.0696 M ⊙ pc −3 , and a local dark matter density of 0.0115 M ⊙ pc −3 . Our main conclusion supports a thicker and more extended thick disk, alongside a cooler thin disk, compared to the best-fitting model of Q. Wang et al. Near the Sun, our model aligns well with observations, but it is less satisfactory at distances far from the Galactic center, perhaps implying unidentified structures. Further high-precision observations will be critical for understanding the dynamics in these outer Galactic regions and will require a more realistic model.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 982(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dynamical Models of the Milky Way in Action Space with LAMOST DR8 and Gaia EDR3 — Guang-Chen Sun, Shude Mao, et al. · The Astrophysical Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS