Effect of hit rate and cognitive style on Bayesian reasoning: evidence from eye movements

While psychological research has established both probability information and cognitive style as key factors in Bayesian reasoning, their interactive effects remain underexplored. We conducted an eye-tracking experiment with 52 undergraduates using EyeLink II to examine how hit rate variations and field dependence/independence influence reasoning patterns during classic Bayesian tasks. Results revealed significant hit rate × cognitive style interactions across multiple eye-tracking measures (total/average fixation durations, area-specific dwell time, fixation proportion). The attention prioritization followed the order: hit rate > false alarm rate > base rate, though base rate information retained measurable influence. High hit rates amplified field-dependent participants' base rate neglect, while field-independent individuals maintained stable attention allocation across conditions. Field-independent reasoners demonstrated superior concentration and more efficient cognitive resource allocation, employing systematic information-processing strategies. These findings clarify the cognitive hierarchy of probability weighting in Bayesian reasoning while validating the critical moderating role of individual differences in information processing styles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1485283
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of hit rate and cognitive style on Bayesian reasoning: evidence from eye movements

Zifu Shi, Huohong Chen, Mei Liu, Lin Yin
1 citations
Frontiers in Psychology
Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
2.48
article

Effect of hit rate and cognitive style on Bayesian reasoning: evidence from eye movements

Zifu Shi, Huohong Chen, Mei Liu, Lin Yin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

While psychological research has established both probability information and cognitive style as key factors in Bayesian reasoning, their interactive effects remain underexplored. We conducted an eye-tracking experiment with 52 undergraduates using EyeLink II to examine how hit rate variations and field dependence/independence influence reasoning patterns during classic Bayesian tasks. Results revealed significant hit rate × cognitive style interactions across multiple eye-tracking measures (total/average fixation durations, area-specific dwell time, fixation proportion). The attention prioritization followed the order: hit rate > false alarm rate > base rate, though base rate information retained measurable influence. High hit rates amplified field-dependent participants' base rate neglect, while field-independent individuals maintained stable attention allocation across conditions. Field-independent reasoners demonstrated superior concentration and more efficient cognitive resource allocation, employing systematic information-processing strategies. These findings clarify the cognitive hierarchy of probability weighting in Bayesian reasoning while validating the critical moderating role of individual differences in information processing styles.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 16
Hunan Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Effect of hit rate and cognitive style on Bayesian reasoning: evidence from eye movements — Zifu Shi, Huohong Chen, et al. · Frontiers in Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS