Predicting Pharmacokinetics in Rats Using Machine Learning: A Comparative Study Between Empirical, Compartmental, and <scp>PBPK</scp> ‐Based Approaches

A successful drug needs to combine several properties including high potency and good pharmacokinetic (PK) properties to sustain efficacious plasma concentration over time. To estimate required doses for preclinical animal efficacy models or for the clinics, in vivo PK studies need to be conducted. Although the prediction of ADME properties of compounds using machine learning (ML) models based on chemical structures is well established in drug discovery, the prediction of complete plasma concentration-time profiles has only recently gained attention. In this study, we systematically compare various approaches that integrate ML models with empiric or mechanistic PK models to predict PK profiles in rats after intravenous administration prior to synthesis. More specifically, we compare a standard noncompartmental analysis (NCA)-based approach (prediction of CL and V<sub>ss</sub>), a pure ML approach (non-mechanistic PK description), a compartmental modeling approach, and a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) approach. Our study based on internal preclinical data shows that the latter three approaches yield PK profile predictions of comparable accuracy across a large data set (evaluated as geometric mean fold errors for each profile of over 1000 small molecules). In summary, we demonstrate the improved ability to prioritize drug candidates with desirable PK properties prior to synthesis with ML predictions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Translational Science
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.70150
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting Pharmacokinetics in Rats Using Machine Learning: A Comparative Study Between Empirical, Compartmental, and PBPK ‐Based Approaches

Moritz Walter, Lina Humbeck, Ghaith Aljayyoussi, Miha Škalič et al.
7 citations
Clinical and Translational Science
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
10.53
article

Predicting Pharmacokinetics in Rats Using Machine Learning: A Comparative Study Between Empirical, Compartmental, and PBPK ‐Based Approaches

Moritz Walter, Lina Humbeck, Ghaith Aljayyoussi, Miha Škalič, Christofer S. Tautermann, Bettina Gerner, Pavel Balazki, Jens Markus Borghardt
article en
7 citations

Abstract

A successful drug needs to combine several properties including high potency and good pharmacokinetic (PK) properties to sustain efficacious plasma concentration over time. To estimate required doses for preclinical animal efficacy models or for the clinics, in vivo PK studies need to be conducted. Although the prediction of ADME properties of compounds using machine learning (ML) models based on chemical structures is well established in drug discovery, the prediction of complete plasma concentration-time profiles has only recently gained attention. In this study, we systematically compare various approaches that integrate ML models with empiric or mechanistic PK models to predict PK profiles in rats after intravenous administration prior to synthesis. More specifically, we compare a standard noncompartmental analysis (NCA)-based approach (prediction of CL and V<sub>ss</sub>), a pure ML approach (non-mechanistic PK description), a compartmental modeling approach, and a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) approach. Our study based on internal preclinical data shows that the latter three approaches yield PK profile predictions of comparable accuracy across a large data set (evaluated as geometric mean fold errors for each profile of over 1000 small molecules). In summary, we demonstrate the improved ability to prioritize drug candidates with desirable PK properties prior to synthesis with ML predictions.

Clinical and Translational ScienceVol. 18(3)
Thorlabs (Germany) (DE), Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
10.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.