Reliability and Validity of the Vividness of Motor Imagery Questionnaire-2 in Individuals With Neurological Motor Impairments: A Preliminary Study

Purpose: Motor imagery (MI) is a cost-effective technique in neurorehabilitation to promote motor learning. The Vividness of Motor Imagery Questionnaire-2 (VMIQ-2) is a reliable and valid tool to assess MI ability in athletes and healthy individuals to improve motor performance. However, its reliability and validity have not been established in individuals with neurological motor impairments. Therefore, this study estimated the test-retest reliability of VMIQ-2 and its concurrent validity with the Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire-10 (KVIQ-10). Methods: A convenience sample of 33 individuals diagnosed with neurological motor impairments was recruited. The researcher administered the KVIQ-10 and the self-reported VMIQ-2 was completed electronically twice, 5–14 days apart. The scores of VMIQ-2 were correlated with KVIQ-10 to determine its concurrent validity, and the test-retest reliability of the total VMIQ-2 and its subscales was also calculated. Bland-Altman analysis was used to identify the differences between the two measures and a two-way mixed random effects model was used to establish the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) between them. Results: The VMIQ-2 and KVIQ-10 demonstrated a statistically significant negative correlation with a moderate effect size ( r = −0.36). The test-retest reliability of VMIQ-2 was high (ICC: 0.87) and the test-retest reliability of each subscale also demonstrated moderate-to-high reliability. The ICC values indicated poor reliability between the two measures while the Bland-Altman analysis indicated no consistent bias of using VMIQ-2 or KVIQ-10 in individuals with neurological motor impairments. Conclusions: Unlike the currently utilized tools, the VMIQ-2 is the first self-reported, reliable, and valid MI assessment tool for individuals with neurological motor impairments. The uniqueness of the VMIQ-2 is that it distinguishes between the different MI perspectives (i.e., internal visual and external visual). Additionally, VMIQ-2 could be an efficient, time-saving electronic measurement tool for use in clinics and telerehabilitation to assess clients' appropriateness for motor imagery practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physiotherapy Canada
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc-2024-0051
Primary Topic
Sport Psychology and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability and Validity of the Vividness of Motor Imagery Questionnaire-2 in Individuals With Neurological Motor Impairments: A Preliminary Study

Mary Shotwell, Roberto López-Rosado, Pratik K. Agrawal, Michael Furtado
Physiotherapy Canada
Sport Psychology and Performance
article

Reliability and Validity of the Vividness of Motor Imagery Questionnaire-2 in Individuals With Neurological Motor Impairments: A Preliminary Study

Mary Shotwell, Roberto López-Rosado, Pratik K. Agrawal, Michael Furtado
article en

Abstract

Purpose: Motor imagery (MI) is a cost-effective technique in neurorehabilitation to promote motor learning. The Vividness of Motor Imagery Questionnaire-2 (VMIQ-2) is a reliable and valid tool to assess MI ability in athletes and healthy individuals to improve motor performance. However, its reliability and validity have not been established in individuals with neurological motor impairments. Therefore, this study estimated the test-retest reliability of VMIQ-2 and its concurrent validity with the Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire-10 (KVIQ-10). Methods: A convenience sample of 33 individuals diagnosed with neurological motor impairments was recruited. The researcher administered the KVIQ-10 and the self-reported VMIQ-2 was completed electronically twice, 5–14 days apart. The scores of VMIQ-2 were correlated with KVIQ-10 to determine its concurrent validity, and the test-retest reliability of the total VMIQ-2 and its subscales was also calculated. Bland-Altman analysis was used to identify the differences between the two measures and a two-way mixed random effects model was used to establish the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) between them. Results: The VMIQ-2 and KVIQ-10 demonstrated a statistically significant negative correlation with a moderate effect size ( r = −0.36). The test-retest reliability of VMIQ-2 was high (ICC: 0.87) and the test-retest reliability of each subscale also demonstrated moderate-to-high reliability. The ICC values indicated poor reliability between the two measures while the Bland-Altman analysis indicated no consistent bias of using VMIQ-2 or KVIQ-10 in individuals with neurological motor impairments. Conclusions: Unlike the currently utilized tools, the VMIQ-2 is the first self-reported, reliable, and valid MI assessment tool for individuals with neurological motor impairments. The uniqueness of the VMIQ-2 is that it distinguishes between the different MI perspectives (i.e., internal visual and external visual). Additionally, VMIQ-2 could be an efficient, time-saving electronic measurement tool for use in clinics and telerehabilitation to assess clients' appropriateness for motor imagery practice.

Physiotherapy CanadaVol. 78(1)
Northwestern University (US), University of North Texas (US), University of North Texas Health Science Center (US), Rocky Mountain University of Health Professions (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Sport Psychology and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.