Regulating Vendor Market Concentration: Challenges in Digital Government for Health Information Sharing

Policymakers face a dilemma in determining the optimal approach to regulating highly concentrated markets, especially in the context of digital government initiatives in healthcare. The current study investigates whether vendor market concentration facilitates or impedes efficiency in health information sharing. Utilizing data from the American Hospital Association’s annual surveys and information technology (IT) surveys from 2014 to 2016, we find that the market concentration of vendors, both at the state and county levels, indeed promotes information sharing among stakeholders. Specifically, when more hospitals in a given state or county use the same IT vendors for information sharing, providers exchange a more detailed level of information with a broader range of stakeholders compared to when using different vendors. Furthermore, we found that such facilitation varies among ownership types. Our findings highlight the complexities faced by policymakers in digital government, as restricting vendor market concentration too hastily could hinder the efficiency of information sharing and collaboration among healthcare providers. Additionally, such concentration may, in fact, enhance information sharing, especially for not-for-profit and for-profit hospitals. Overall, understanding the relationship between market concentration and information sharing can help healthcare administrators allocate resources more strategically, leading to better planning and less resource wastage, while aligning operational strategies with broader sustainability goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Administrative Sciences
Published
2025-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15030105
Primary Topic
Electronic Health Records Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regulating Vendor Market Concentration: Challenges in Digital Government for Health Information Sharing

Na-Eun Cho
Administrative Sciences
Electronic Health Records Systems
article

Regulating Vendor Market Concentration: Challenges in Digital Government for Health Information Sharing

Na-Eun Cho
article en

Abstract

Policymakers face a dilemma in determining the optimal approach to regulating highly concentrated markets, especially in the context of digital government initiatives in healthcare. The current study investigates whether vendor market concentration facilitates or impedes efficiency in health information sharing. Utilizing data from the American Hospital Association’s annual surveys and information technology (IT) surveys from 2014 to 2016, we find that the market concentration of vendors, both at the state and county levels, indeed promotes information sharing among stakeholders. Specifically, when more hospitals in a given state or county use the same IT vendors for information sharing, providers exchange a more detailed level of information with a broader range of stakeholders compared to when using different vendors. Furthermore, we found that such facilitation varies among ownership types. Our findings highlight the complexities faced by policymakers in digital government, as restricting vendor market concentration too hastily could hinder the efficiency of information sharing and collaboration among healthcare providers. Additionally, such concentration may, in fact, enhance information sharing, especially for not-for-profit and for-profit hospitals. Overall, understanding the relationship between market concentration and information sharing can help healthcare administrators allocate resources more strategically, leading to better planning and less resource wastage, while aligning operational strategies with broader sustainability goals.

Administrative SciencesVol. 15(3)
Hongik University (KR)
Hongik University
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Electronic Health Records Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.