A Comparison of Physical Characteristics in Different Brands and Staining Techniques in a Brand of Lissamine Green Strips

<b>Backgrounds/Objectives:</b> The aim of this study was to compare differences in the physical characteristics of lissamine green (LG) strips and the outcomes of using different staining techniques. <b>Methods:</b> Two separate complementary investigations were conducted. Physical study: Differences between four LG strips were evaluated in terms of material, dye concentration, and dye absorption. In vivo study: Bulbar conjunctival staining was compared for four application methods of I-DEW LG strips presented in a randomized order for twenty-two participants: (1) single application 5 s after wetting (also repeated using GreenGlo for comparison), (2) single application using two strips held together, 5 s after wetting, (3) two applications using a single LG strip 5 s after wetting, 1 minute apart, (4) the same as method 3, with a single fluorescein strip in between LG applications. White light imaging was performed immediately following application and after 30, 60, 90, and 300 s. Three masked practitioners independently evaluated the randomized staining images for spot count and staining intensity. <b>Results:</b> Physical study: Strip paper fibres demonstrated visible similarities, with no difference in saline absorption (<i>p</i> > 0.05). LG concentration increased as saline retention duration increased (F = 964.1, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and GreenGlo tips were significantly darker (F = 2775.2, <i>p</i> < 0.001). In vivo study: I-DEW application resulted in less conjunctival staining than GreenGlo (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Amongst I-DEW application techniques, staining levels were similar (<i>p</i> > 0.05); however, staining intensity was significantly higher following two applications of I-DEW, 1 min apart, compared to a single application (<i>p</i> = 0.042). Both spot count and staining intensity decreased with time (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> Two applications of I-DEW using a single strip, 1 min apart, after wetting with a single drop of saline provided maximal staining. There was also a significant difference in staining intensity observed between LG products.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14062022
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.51
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparison of Physical Characteristics in Different Brands and Staining Techniques in a Brand of Lissamine Green Strips

Jennifer P. Craig, Dean Dunning, Zafar Iqbal Khan, Alison Alderson et al.
4 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
7.51
article

A Comparison of Physical Characteristics in Different Brands and Staining Techniques in a Brand of Lissamine Green Strips

Jennifer P. Craig, Dean Dunning, Zafar Iqbal Khan, Alison Alderson, Mohammed Mohammed Ibrahim, Debarun Dutta, Laura E. Sweeney, S. Kanaga Suba Raja, Carole Maldonado‐Codina, Katharine Evans, Louise Terry, Mahesh Raj Joshi, Neema Ghorbani‐Mojarrad, Marta Vianya-Estopà, James S. Wolffsohn, Byki Huntjens, Manbir Nagra, Elisabeth Martin, R Hussain, Thomas Godfrey
article en
4 citations

Abstract

<b>Backgrounds/Objectives:</b> The aim of this study was to compare differences in the physical characteristics of lissamine green (LG) strips and the outcomes of using different staining techniques. <b>Methods:</b> Two separate complementary investigations were conducted. Physical study: Differences between four LG strips were evaluated in terms of material, dye concentration, and dye absorption. In vivo study: Bulbar conjunctival staining was compared for four application methods of I-DEW LG strips presented in a randomized order for twenty-two participants: (1) single application 5 s after wetting (also repeated using GreenGlo for comparison), (2) single application using two strips held together, 5 s after wetting, (3) two applications using a single LG strip 5 s after wetting, 1 minute apart, (4) the same as method 3, with a single fluorescein strip in between LG applications. White light imaging was performed immediately following application and after 30, 60, 90, and 300 s. Three masked practitioners independently evaluated the randomized staining images for spot count and staining intensity. <b>Results:</b> Physical study: Strip paper fibres demonstrated visible similarities, with no difference in saline absorption (<i>p</i> > 0.05). LG concentration increased as saline retention duration increased (F = 964.1, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and GreenGlo tips were significantly darker (F = 2775.2, <i>p</i> < 0.001). In vivo study: I-DEW application resulted in less conjunctival staining than GreenGlo (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Amongst I-DEW application techniques, staining levels were similar (<i>p</i> > 0.05); however, staining intensity was significantly higher following two applications of I-DEW, 1 min apart, compared to a single application (<i>p</i> = 0.042). Both spot count and staining intensity decreased with time (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> Two applications of I-DEW using a single strip, 1 min apart, after wetting with a single drop of saline provided maximal staining. There was also a significant difference in staining intensity observed between LG products.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(6)
University of Bradford (GB), University of Auckland (NZ), St George's, University of London (GB), Aston University (GB), Glasgow Caledonian University (GB), Bradford Royal Infirmary (GB), University of Manchester (GB), City St George's, University of London (GB), Anglia Ruskin University (GB), Cardiff University (GB), University of Plymouth (GB), Bradford College, England (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
7.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.