Comparative Study on Numerical Simulation of CH<sub>4</sub> Breakthrough Pressure in Unsaturated Rock Based on Step‐By‐Step Method and Continuous Injection Method

ABSTRACT Gas breakthrough pressure is a key parameter affecting gas production and evaluation of tight reservoir sealing capabilities. This study aims to explore the impact of different injection methods on CH 4 breakthrough pressure in unsaturated rocks. COMSOL Multiphysics was used to simulate the CH 4 breakthrough process, and comparative analysis was conducted using step‐by‐step and continuous injection methods. The results show that the step‐by‐step method has higher measurement accuracy under low CH 4 breakthrough pressure and is suitable for scenarios that require precise evaluation, whereas the continuous injection method is more efficient under high CH 4 breakthrough pressure and is suitable for rapid evaluation needs. According to outcomes of simulation, this research suggested a numerical optimization framework aimed at forecasting the breakthrough pressure of CH 4 and verified the accuracy and applicability of the model through linear fitting of experimental data and predicted values. In addition, the study also conducted a sensitivity analysis on the pore distribution index ( m ) and injection flow rate ( u in ) in the van Genuchten model. The results show that u in has a small impact on breakthrough pressure, whereas m has a considerable effect on breakthrough pressure. An increase in m leads to an increase in breakthrough pressure, thereby enhancing the sealing performance of rock core. This study reveals the applicability difference between the step‐by‐step method and the continuous injection method in predicting CH 4 breakthrough pressure and proposes an effective prediction method based on numerical simulation, which provides valuable insights for selecting gas injection methods and predicting breakthrough pressure in rocks. © 2025 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Greenhouse Gases Science and Technology
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.2335
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study on Numerical Simulation of CH4 Breakthrough Pressure in Unsaturated Rock Based on Step‐By‐Step Method and Continuous Injection Method

Qingchun Yu, Jiaqi Zhao, Qi Li, Yi Li et al.
4 citations
Greenhouse Gases Science and Technology
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
4.58
article

Comparative Study on Numerical Simulation of CH4 Breakthrough Pressure in Unsaturated Rock Based on Step‐By‐Step Method and Continuous Injection Method

Qingchun Yu, Jiaqi Zhao, Qi Li, Yi Li, Wentao Ban
article en
4 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Gas breakthrough pressure is a key parameter affecting gas production and evaluation of tight reservoir sealing capabilities. This study aims to explore the impact of different injection methods on CH 4 breakthrough pressure in unsaturated rocks. COMSOL Multiphysics was used to simulate the CH 4 breakthrough process, and comparative analysis was conducted using step‐by‐step and continuous injection methods. The results show that the step‐by‐step method has higher measurement accuracy under low CH 4 breakthrough pressure and is suitable for scenarios that require precise evaluation, whereas the continuous injection method is more efficient under high CH 4 breakthrough pressure and is suitable for rapid evaluation needs. According to outcomes of simulation, this research suggested a numerical optimization framework aimed at forecasting the breakthrough pressure of CH 4 and verified the accuracy and applicability of the model through linear fitting of experimental data and predicted values. In addition, the study also conducted a sensitivity analysis on the pore distribution index ( m ) and injection flow rate ( u in ) in the van Genuchten model. The results show that u in has a small impact on breakthrough pressure, whereas m has a considerable effect on breakthrough pressure. An increase in m leads to an increase in breakthrough pressure, thereby enhancing the sealing performance of rock core. This study reveals the applicability difference between the step‐by‐step method and the continuous injection method in predicting CH 4 breakthrough pressure and proposes an effective prediction method based on numerical simulation, which provides valuable insights for selecting gas injection methods and predicting breakthrough pressure in rocks. © 2025 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.

Greenhouse Gases Science and TechnologyVol. 15(2)
Tianjin University (CN), China University of Geosciences (Beijing) (CN), Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
4.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.