Differentiated yet common sentiments: UK news coverage on the Biden–Xi summit meeting

Britain’s policy on China fluctuated from positive engagement to China scepticism between 2015 and 2023, influenced by geopolitical and domestic politics and economic concerns. British media coverage of US–China interactions and rivalry therefore warrants scrutiny. The US–China summit meeting of November 2023 offered such an opportunity. This article uses a critical discourse analysis approach to analyse UK coverage of Xi Jinping’s US visit. Portrayals of the summit are examined in terms of differing tones and stances adopted by The Guardian , the BBC , and the Daily Mail news outlets. It is found that while the Daily Mail ’s tone toward the summit meeting was overwhelmingly negative, that of The Guardian was moderately positive and the BBC ’s tone was mostly neutral. Narratives reveal that Britain positioned itself between the two rivals through an inclusion of diverse, elite perspectives and that news framing of China cohered with Anglo–American ideological norms and special relations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Media and China
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20594364251325515
Primary Topic
Media Studies and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differentiated yet common sentiments: UK news coverage on the Biden–Xi summit meeting

Hongyi Lai, Angela Lewis
Global Media and China
Media Studies and Communication
article

Differentiated yet common sentiments: UK news coverage on the Biden–Xi summit meeting

Hongyi Lai, Angela Lewis
article en

Abstract

Britain’s policy on China fluctuated from positive engagement to China scepticism between 2015 and 2023, influenced by geopolitical and domestic politics and economic concerns. British media coverage of US–China interactions and rivalry therefore warrants scrutiny. The US–China summit meeting of November 2023 offered such an opportunity. This article uses a critical discourse analysis approach to analyse UK coverage of Xi Jinping’s US visit. Portrayals of the summit are examined in terms of differing tones and stances adopted by The Guardian , the BBC , and the Daily Mail news outlets. It is found that while the Daily Mail ’s tone toward the summit meeting was overwhelmingly negative, that of The Guardian was moderately positive and the BBC ’s tone was mostly neutral. Narratives reveal that Britain positioned itself between the two rivals through an inclusion of diverse, elite perspectives and that news framing of China cohered with Anglo–American ideological norms and special relations.

Global Media and ChinaVol. 10(2)
University of Nottingham (GB), Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Media Studies and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Differentiated yet common sentiments: UK news coverage on the Biden–Xi summit meeting — Hongyi Lai, Angela Lewis · Global Media and China (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS