P317: Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis, management, and surveillance of people with LMNB1 related autosomal dominant leukodystrophy: A consensus-based approach

Methods: We developed a cross-ancestry PRS model for CAD and integrated it with the Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE), a standard clinical tool used to predict the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), to derive the caIRS, which estimates 10-year absolute CAD risk.We retrospectively validated the performance of the caIRS in comparison to the PCE using the diverse, US based Penn Medicine Biobank (PMBB).For prospective validation, we designed a randomized controlled clinical trial.We will recruit 1000, CAD-free participants with borderline/intermediate PCE risk (5-20%) across three large US healthcare centers.Using previously genotyped data, eligible participants will be stratified by caIRS into average (caIRS <20%) and high risk (caIRS 20%) categories and randomized into early or delayed reporting arms.Clinical genome sequencing (GS) will be performed after consent.The early reporting arm will receive their caIRS report ~2-3 months post-enrollment, while the delayed reporting arm will receive a PCE-only report initially with caIRS reported after 3 years.Participants will complete questionnaires at enrollment, post-report release, and 1-year post-enrollment to assess knowledge and behavioral impact.CAD incidence, statin use, and lab results will be tracked over 5 years and compared to evaluate the impact of caIRS on outcomes and provider behavior.Results: In the retrospective analysis of PMBB participants classified as borderline/intermediate risk using the standard PCE model (5-20%) the caIRS reclassified (20% threshold) 588 out of 6067 individuals into the high-risk group, which experienced 36.8% (95% CI: 31.3-41.8)incidence of CAD compared to 11.6% (95% CI: 10.4-12.8)incidence for all others -motivating further prospective validation study.Conclusion: Using the CAD caIRS, which combines genetic and traditional clinical risk factors, to refine clinical risk estimates has the potential to improve treatment guidance in a primary prevention setting.The results from the prospective trial will provide insights into how the integration of caIRS influences long-term cardiovascular outcomes and personalized treatment strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Genetics in Medicine Open
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gimo.2025.102282
Primary Topic
RNA regulation and disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P317: Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis, management, and surveillance of people with LMNB1 related autosomal dominant leukodystrophy: A consensus-based approach

Anne Harris, Karthik Muthusamy, Bishen Jeet Singh, Margot A. Cousin et al.
Genetics in Medicine Open
RNA regulation and disease
article

P317: Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis, management, and surveillance of people with LMNB1 related autosomal dominant leukodystrophy: A consensus-based approach

Anne Harris, Karthik Muthusamy, Bishen Jeet Singh, Margot A. Cousin, Radhika Dhamija, Brent L. Fogel, Elisa Giorgio, W. Oliver Tobin, Quasar Saleem Padiath, Heather A. Billings, Ralitza Gavrilova, Pietro Cortelli, Holly Appleberry, Keti Mamillo, Raili Rainiko, Ujjal Didar Singh Sekhon
article en

Abstract

Methods: We developed a cross-ancestry PRS model for CAD and integrated it with the Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE), a standard clinical tool used to predict the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), to derive the caIRS, which estimates 10-year absolute CAD risk.We retrospectively validated the performance of the caIRS in comparison to the PCE using the diverse, US based Penn Medicine Biobank (PMBB).For prospective validation, we designed a randomized controlled clinical trial.We will recruit 1000, CAD-free participants with borderline/intermediate PCE risk (5-20%) across three large US healthcare centers.Using previously genotyped data, eligible participants will be stratified by caIRS into average (caIRS <20%) and high risk (caIRS 20%) categories and randomized into early or delayed reporting arms.Clinical genome sequencing (GS) will be performed after consent.The early reporting arm will receive their caIRS report ~2-3 months post-enrollment, while the delayed reporting arm will receive a PCE-only report initially with caIRS reported after 3 years.Participants will complete questionnaires at enrollment, post-report release, and 1-year post-enrollment to assess knowledge and behavioral impact.CAD incidence, statin use, and lab results will be tracked over 5 years and compared to evaluate the impact of caIRS on outcomes and provider behavior.Results: In the retrospective analysis of PMBB participants classified as borderline/intermediate risk using the standard PCE model (5-20%) the caIRS reclassified (20% threshold) 588 out of 6067 individuals into the high-risk group, which experienced 36.8% (95% CI: 31.3-41.8)incidence of CAD compared to 11.6% (95% CI: 10.4-12.8)incidence for all others -motivating further prospective validation study.Conclusion: Using the CAD caIRS, which combines genetic and traditional clinical risk factors, to refine clinical risk estimates has the potential to improve treatment guidance in a primary prevention setting.The results from the prospective trial will provide insights into how the integration of caIRS influences long-term cardiovascular outcomes and personalized treatment strategies.

Genetics in Medicine OpenVol. 3
Uppsala University (SE), Mayo Clinic (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), University of Pavia (IT), Foundation Center (US), University of California System (US), Urology Foundation (GB), Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna (IT), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US), Analog and Digital Peripherals (United States) (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
RNA regulation and disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.