An experimental study of a novel high-precision iliac vein pressure measuring device to evaluate iliac vein compression syndrome

ObjectiveThis study aims to assess the clinical value of a novel high-precision iliac vein pressure measuring device to diagnose and treat iliac vein compression syndrome.MethodsA total of 38 patients with clinically confirmed iliac vein compression syndrome (all lesions on the left side) were selected. The iliac vein pressure and pressure recovery time (time taken for pressure to return to resting levels) were measured in four states: rest, affected limb elevation, ankle extension and flexion, and gastrocnemius muscle compression. Bilateral comparisons and pre- and post-treatment assessments were conducted.ResultsThe left iliac vein pressure in the four states (42.40 ± 16.08 mmH<sub>2</sub>O, 51.23 ± 17.63 mmH<sub>2</sub>O, 70.26 ± 25.55 mmH<sub>2</sub>O, and 111.47 ± 58.78 mmH<sub>2</sub>O) and pressure recovery time (25.57 ± 10.65 s) were significantly higher compared to the right iliac vein pressure (30.67 ± 7.46 mmH<sub>2</sub>O, 36.55 ± 8.59 mmH<sub>2</sub>O, 44.84 ± 11.17 mmH<sub>2</sub>O, and 52.96 ± 14.06 mmH<sub>2</sub>O) and recovery time (18.92 ± 21.07 s) (<i>p</i> = .000). The pressure in patients with left iliac occlusion (179.07 ± 31.64 mmH<sub>2</sub>O) was significantly higher than in patients with stenosis (79.91 ± 33.54 mmH<sub>2</sub>O) (<i>p</i> = .000). In eight patients who underwent intraluminal iliac venous therapy, postoperative pressure (37.29 ± 7.53 mmH<sub>2</sub>O, 44.74 ± 5.10 mmH<sub>2</sub>O, 53.76 ± 5.36 mmH<sub>2</sub>O, and 61.96 ± 7.27 mmH<sub>2</sub>O) and pressure recovery time (20.88 ± 5.67 s) significantly improved compared to preoperative measurements (50.53 ± 8.21 mmH<sub>2</sub>O, 60.03 ± 7.50 mmH<sub>2</sub>O, 96.88 ± 11.67 mmH<sub>2</sub>O, 177.11 ± 22.40 mmH<sub>2</sub>O, and 35.50 ± 6.95 s) (<i>p</i> < .01). Despite improvements, postoperative left iliac pressure remained significantly higher than the right iliac pressure in different states (<i>p</i> < .05). The left iliac vein pressure increased significantly during ankle extension and flexion, as well as gastrocnemius muscle compression compared to resting and elevated limb states (<i>p</i> < .05).ConclusionThe innovative high-precision iliac vein pressure measuring device enables rapid and accurate quantification of iliac vein pressure. As a functional diagnostic method, it holds considerable clinical value in diagnosing iliac vein compression syndrome and evaluating treatment efficacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vascular
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381251325652
Primary Topic
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An experimental study of a novel high-precision iliac vein pressure measuring device to evaluate iliac vein compression syndrome

Cunfa Liu, Liguo Liu, Ziyuan Zhao, Xiangchen Dai et al.
Vascular
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
article

An experimental study of a novel high-precision iliac vein pressure measuring device to evaluate iliac vein compression syndrome

Cunfa Liu, Liguo Liu, Ziyuan Zhao, Xiangchen Dai, Xiujun Zhang, Junjie Huang
article en

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study aims to assess the clinical value of a novel high-precision iliac vein pressure measuring device to diagnose and treat iliac vein compression syndrome.MethodsA total of 38 patients with clinically confirmed iliac vein compression syndrome (all lesions on the left side) were selected. The iliac vein pressure and pressure recovery time (time taken for pressure to return to resting levels) were measured in four states: rest, affected limb elevation, ankle extension and flexion, and gastrocnemius muscle compression. Bilateral comparisons and pre- and post-treatment assessments were conducted.ResultsThe left iliac vein pressure in the four states (42.40 ± 16.08 mmH<sub>2</sub>O, 51.23 ± 17.63 mmH<sub>2</sub>O, 70.26 ± 25.55 mmH<sub>2</sub>O, and 111.47 ± 58.78 mmH<sub>2</sub>O) and pressure recovery time (25.57 ± 10.65 s) were significantly higher compared to the right iliac vein pressure (30.67 ± 7.46 mmH<sub>2</sub>O, 36.55 ± 8.59 mmH<sub>2</sub>O, 44.84 ± 11.17 mmH<sub>2</sub>O, and 52.96 ± 14.06 mmH<sub>2</sub>O) and recovery time (18.92 ± 21.07 s) (<i>p</i> = .000). The pressure in patients with left iliac occlusion (179.07 ± 31.64 mmH<sub>2</sub>O) was significantly higher than in patients with stenosis (79.91 ± 33.54 mmH<sub>2</sub>O) (<i>p</i> = .000). In eight patients who underwent intraluminal iliac venous therapy, postoperative pressure (37.29 ± 7.53 mmH<sub>2</sub>O, 44.74 ± 5.10 mmH<sub>2</sub>O, 53.76 ± 5.36 mmH<sub>2</sub>O, and 61.96 ± 7.27 mmH<sub>2</sub>O) and pressure recovery time (20.88 ± 5.67 s) significantly improved compared to preoperative measurements (50.53 ± 8.21 mmH<sub>2</sub>O, 60.03 ± 7.50 mmH<sub>2</sub>O, 96.88 ± 11.67 mmH<sub>2</sub>O, 177.11 ± 22.40 mmH<sub>2</sub>O, and 35.50 ± 6.95 s) (<i>p</i> < .01). Despite improvements, postoperative left iliac pressure remained significantly higher than the right iliac pressure in different states (<i>p</i> < .05). The left iliac vein pressure increased significantly during ankle extension and flexion, as well as gastrocnemius muscle compression compared to resting and elevated limb states (<i>p</i> < .05).ConclusionThe innovative high-precision iliac vein pressure measuring device enables rapid and accurate quantification of iliac vein pressure. As a functional diagnostic method, it holds considerable clinical value in diagnosing iliac vein compression syndrome and evaluating treatment efficacy.

VascularVol. 34(1)
Tianjin Medical University General Hospital (CN), Tianjin Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.