Criminal Responsibility for the Dissemination of Discrediting Materials Concerning the Armed Forces According to the Russian Criminal Code

This article considers criminal responsibility for the dissemination of discrediting materials of the armed forces of the Russian Federation. The academic paper is a legislative analysis of the law of the Russian Federation of 2022 prohibiting the „discreditation and dissemination of armed forces of the Russian Federation.” Based on the analysis of the elements of crime, the author puts forward a hypothesis about the controversial and subjective matter of the novelisation. The imprecise terminology and definitions of the discussed legal act introducing such criminal responsibility, allow the law enforcement agencies to punish any opinion which somehow differs from the official narration. In addition, the historical roots of this prohibition are considered. The article provides comprehensive review of the judicature practice of Russian courts.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Nordicum-Mediterraneum
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33112/nm.20.1.4
Primary Topic
Education, Law, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Criminal Responsibility for the Dissemination of Discrediting Materials Concerning the Armed Forces According to the Russian Criminal Code

Georgii Sibirtsev
Nordicum-Mediterraneum
Education, Law, and Society
article

Criminal Responsibility for the Dissemination of Discrediting Materials Concerning the Armed Forces According to the Russian Criminal Code

Georgii Sibirtsev
article en

Abstract

This article considers criminal responsibility for the dissemination of discrediting materials of the armed forces of the Russian Federation. The academic paper is a legislative analysis of the law of the Russian Federation of 2022 prohibiting the „discreditation and dissemination of armed forces of the Russian Federation.” Based on the analysis of the elements of crime, the author puts forward a hypothesis about the controversial and subjective matter of the novelisation. The imprecise terminology and definitions of the discussed legal act introducing such criminal responsibility, allow the law enforcement agencies to punish any opinion which somehow differs from the official narration. In addition, the historical roots of this prohibition are considered. The article provides comprehensive review of the judicature practice of Russian courts.

Nordicum-MediterraneumVol. 20(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Education, Law, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.