A comparative study of multimodal magnetic resonance imaging parameters for distinguishing lacrimal gland lymphoma from immune globulin G4-related lacrimal disease and lacrimal gland inflammatory pseudotumor

Immune globulin G4-related lacrimal disease (IgG4-RLD) and lacrimal gland inflammatory pseudotumor (LGIP) may be misdiagnosed as lacrimal gland lymphoma (LGL) by conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) alone. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of multiple MRI parameters in distinguishing LGL from IgG4-RLD and LGIP. The MRI data, including conventional MRI, diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), of nine, eight, and nine patients with LGL, IgG4-RLD, and LGIP, respectively, confirmed by histopathology, were collected from October 2010 to August 2021. We compared among the three groups using variance analysis, least significant difference, and rank sum tests. We performed multivariate logistic regression analysis including statistically significant MRI parameters to establish a model and evaluated the diagnostic efficacy using the receiver operating characteristic curve. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) ratios were significantly different among the patients with LGL, IgG4-RLD, and LGIP (0.88 ± 0.11 and 1.14 ± 0.29, P = 0.036; 0.88 ± 0.11 and 1.40 ± 0.27, P < 0.001; 1.40 ± 0.27 and 1.14 ± 0.29, P = 0.030). Additionally, DWI signal intensity (DWI-SI), ADC-SI, and extravascular extracellular space volume per unit tissue volume (Ve) values significantly differed between patients with LGL and LGIP. DWI-SI and ADC ratios were the most valuable parameters for predicting and diagnosing LGL. The areas under the curve of the DWI-SI and ADC ratio for predicting LGL potency were 0.83 and 0.87, respectively. The ADC ratio might aid in the differential diagnosis of LGL, IgG4-RLD, and LGIP. DWI-SI, ADC-SI, and Ve values might facilitate the differential diagnosis between LGL and LGIP. A logistic regression model based on DWI-SI and the ADC ratio showed promise for accurate clinical diagnosis of LGL.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chinese Journal of Academic Radiology
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42058-025-00184-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
IgG4-Related and Inflammatory Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study of multimodal magnetic resonance imaging parameters for distinguishing lacrimal gland lymphoma from immune globulin G4-related lacrimal disease and lacrimal gland inflammatory pseudotumor

Bentao Yang, Jing Li, Yi Lin
1 citations
Chinese Journal of Academic Radiology
IgG4-Related and Inflammatory Diseases
1.67
article

A comparative study of multimodal magnetic resonance imaging parameters for distinguishing lacrimal gland lymphoma from immune globulin G4-related lacrimal disease and lacrimal gland inflammatory pseudotumor

Bentao Yang, Jing Li, Yi Lin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Immune globulin G4-related lacrimal disease (IgG4-RLD) and lacrimal gland inflammatory pseudotumor (LGIP) may be misdiagnosed as lacrimal gland lymphoma (LGL) by conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) alone. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of multiple MRI parameters in distinguishing LGL from IgG4-RLD and LGIP. The MRI data, including conventional MRI, diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), of nine, eight, and nine patients with LGL, IgG4-RLD, and LGIP, respectively, confirmed by histopathology, were collected from October 2010 to August 2021. We compared among the three groups using variance analysis, least significant difference, and rank sum tests. We performed multivariate logistic regression analysis including statistically significant MRI parameters to establish a model and evaluated the diagnostic efficacy using the receiver operating characteristic curve. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) ratios were significantly different among the patients with LGL, IgG4-RLD, and LGIP (0.88 ± 0.11 and 1.14 ± 0.29, P = 0.036; 0.88 ± 0.11 and 1.40 ± 0.27, P < 0.001; 1.40 ± 0.27 and 1.14 ± 0.29, P = 0.030). Additionally, DWI signal intensity (DWI-SI), ADC-SI, and extravascular extracellular space volume per unit tissue volume (Ve) values significantly differed between patients with LGL and LGIP. DWI-SI and ADC ratios were the most valuable parameters for predicting and diagnosing LGL. The areas under the curve of the DWI-SI and ADC ratio for predicting LGL potency were 0.83 and 0.87, respectively. The ADC ratio might aid in the differential diagnosis of LGL, IgG4-RLD, and LGIP. DWI-SI, ADC-SI, and Ve values might facilitate the differential diagnosis between LGL and LGIP. A logistic regression model based on DWI-SI and the ADC ratio showed promise for accurate clinical diagnosis of LGL.

Chinese Journal of Academic RadiologyVol. 8(2)
Beijing Tongren Hospital (CN), Capital Medical University (CN), Fourth Hospital of Changsha (CN), Yantaishan Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
IgG4-Related and Inflammatory Diseases
1.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.