How Do Energy Price, Density, and Gini Changes Explain Biodiversity Outcomes? The Empirical Case of the United States

Biodiversity is diminishing and will continue to do so in the coming decades as human-caused biodiversity changes occur in both the developed and developing worlds. Using data from the United States of America for a cross-section of 39 states in 2010, this study merged the aspects of energy economics and income inequality, aiming to explain biodiversity in the developed world and find that there are opposite effects at play. On the one hand, more energy density in a state has a biodiversity-diminishing impact, and higher energy prices protect biodiverse areas. On the other hand, the dynamics of income inequality have a surprising effect: the more unequal a state’s income has become in recent decades, the more biodiverse land is being protected. Thus, the rise in inequality is associated with more biodiverse land. Finally, this article discussed the linkages with the existing literature and provided policy recommendations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062605
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Do Energy Price, Density, and Gini Changes Explain Biodiversity Outcomes? The Empirical Case of the United States

Behrang Chenari, José Alberto Fuinhas, Anna Auza, Shiva Saadatian
Sustainability
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

How Do Energy Price, Density, and Gini Changes Explain Biodiversity Outcomes? The Empirical Case of the United States

Behrang Chenari, José Alberto Fuinhas, Anna Auza, Shiva Saadatian
article en

Abstract

Biodiversity is diminishing and will continue to do so in the coming decades as human-caused biodiversity changes occur in both the developed and developing worlds. Using data from the United States of America for a cross-section of 39 states in 2010, this study merged the aspects of energy economics and income inequality, aiming to explain biodiversity in the developed world and find that there are opposite effects at play. On the one hand, more energy density in a state has a biodiversity-diminishing impact, and higher energy prices protect biodiverse areas. On the other hand, the dynamics of income inequality have a surprising effect: the more unequal a state’s income has become in recent decades, the more biodiverse land is being protected. Thus, the rise in inequality is associated with more biodiverse land. Finally, this article discussed the linkages with the existing literature and provided policy recommendations.

SustainabilityVol. 17(6)
University of Coimbra (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.