Assessing Articular Cartilage and CFL Damage Following Fibular Nailing: A Cadaveric Study

Submission Type: Ankle Fractures Research Type: Level 5 - Case report, Expert opinion, Personal observation Introduction/Purpose: Traditional surgical fixation of ankle fractures involves the application of plates and screws, which carries a risk of wound complications, hardware prominence, and soft tissue irritation. Intramedullary (IM) fibular nailing offers a minimally invasive alternative with potentially lower complication rates. Evidence is lacking regarding the impact of fibular nailing on structures around the insertion site of the nail, particularly the articular cartilage of the distal fibula and the calcaneofibular ligament (CFL), where damage could lead to degenerative changes, instability, or pain. Methods: In order to address this gap, this study assessed the risk and extent of damage to surrounding anatomical structures during IM nail fixation on 10 clinical-grade cadaver lower extremities. Risk was classified based on distances from the nail to the CFL, anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL), sural nerve (SN), superficial peroneal nerve (SPN), peroneus longus (PL), peroneus brevis (PB), and articular cartilage: high-risk (0–5 mm), moderate-risk (5.1–10 mm), or low-risk (over 10 mm). Distance measurements and damage quantification was completed by two observers. Results: The CFL was damaged in 3 out of 10 specimens, ranging from 14% to 64% of the ligament's width. The average distances to the CFL (1.20 mm), ATFL (3.43 mm), PB (3.19 mm), and articular cartilage (3.45 mm) were within the high-risk range, though no significant damage was observed to the articular cartilage, ATFL, SN, or SPN. Conclusion: This study further confirms that IM fibular nailing is a generally safe and a reliable option for treating ankle fractures, though careful attention should be given to the potential for iatrogenic damage to high-risk soft-tissue structures, particularly the CFL and peroneal tendons.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011425s00044
Primary Topic
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Articular Cartilage and CFL Damage Following Fibular Nailing: A Cadaveric Study

Madeline Power, S. Sameer Mohiuddin, Jacob Matz, Erin Bigney et al.
1 links
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Foot and Ankle Surgery
article

Assessing Articular Cartilage and CFL Damage Following Fibular Nailing: A Cadaveric Study

Madeline Power, S. Sameer Mohiuddin, Jacob Matz, Erin Bigney, W Mayer, Xiuming Shi, Hirbod Abootalebi
article en

Abstract

Submission Type: Ankle Fractures Research Type: Level 5 - Case report, Expert opinion, Personal observation Introduction/Purpose: Traditional surgical fixation of ankle fractures involves the application of plates and screws, which carries a risk of wound complications, hardware prominence, and soft tissue irritation. Intramedullary (IM) fibular nailing offers a minimally invasive alternative with potentially lower complication rates. Evidence is lacking regarding the impact of fibular nailing on structures around the insertion site of the nail, particularly the articular cartilage of the distal fibula and the calcaneofibular ligament (CFL), where damage could lead to degenerative changes, instability, or pain. Methods: In order to address this gap, this study assessed the risk and extent of damage to surrounding anatomical structures during IM nail fixation on 10 clinical-grade cadaver lower extremities. Risk was classified based on distances from the nail to the CFL, anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL), sural nerve (SN), superficial peroneal nerve (SPN), peroneus longus (PL), peroneus brevis (PB), and articular cartilage: high-risk (0–5 mm), moderate-risk (5.1–10 mm), or low-risk (over 10 mm). Distance measurements and damage quantification was completed by two observers. Results: The CFL was damaged in 3 out of 10 specimens, ranging from 14% to 64% of the ligament's width. The average distances to the CFL (1.20 mm), ATFL (3.43 mm), PB (3.19 mm), and articular cartilage (3.45 mm) were within the high-risk range, though no significant damage was observed to the articular cartilage, ATFL, SN, or SPN. Conclusion: This study further confirms that IM fibular nailing is a generally safe and a reliable option for treating ankle fractures, though careful attention should be given to the potential for iatrogenic damage to high-risk soft-tissue structures, particularly the CFL and peroneal tendons.

Foot & Ankle OrthopaedicsVol. 10(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Foot and Ankle Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessing Articular Cartilage and CFL Damage Following Fibular Nailing: A Cadaveric Study — Madeline Power, S. Sameer Mohiuddin, et al. · Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS