Estimating the Burden of False Positives and Implementation Costs From Adding Multiple Single Cancer Tests or a Single Multi‐Cancer Test to Standard‐Of‐Care Screening

A screening system for average-risk individuals using multiple SCED tests has a higher rate of false positives and associated costs compared with a single MCED test. A set of SCED tests with the same sensitivity as standard-of-care screening detects only modestly more cancers than an MCED test limited to the same set of cancers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Medicine
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.70776
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating the Burden of False Positives and Implementation Costs From Adding Multiple Single Cancer Tests or a Single Multi‐Cancer Test to Standard‐Of‐Care Screening

Christina A. Clarke, Allan Hackshaw, Earl Hubbell, Sarina Madhavan et al.
2 citations
Cancer Medicine
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
2.09
article

Estimating the Burden of False Positives and Implementation Costs From Adding Multiple Single Cancer Tests or a Single Multi‐Cancer Test to Standard‐Of‐Care Screening

Christina A. Clarke, Allan Hackshaw, Earl Hubbell, Sarina Madhavan, Ellen T. Chang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

A screening system for average-risk individuals using multiple SCED tests has a higher rate of false positives and associated costs compared with a single MCED test. A set of SCED tests with the same sensitivity as standard-of-care screening detects only modestly more cancers than an MCED test limited to the same set of cancers.

Cancer MedicineVol. 14(6)
Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Menlo School (US), Grail (United States) (US), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
2.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.