Unveiling the knowledge structure of corporate governance and board structure: a bibliometric analysis

Purpose This study aims to examine the present state of board structure studies while examining current trends in research and potential future paths. Design/methodology/approach The study builds upon the articles indexed in the Web of Science database. A systematic search of the articles was conducted using the keywords search string. After using all exclusion criteria, 1,265 research papers were retrieved for analysis. RStudio combined with VOSviewer was used for network analysis and content analysis. Findings The results of the study reveal that the knowledge base of board structure had grown exponentially over time. The USA, the UK and Australia are the top three leading countries, and also the USA and the People’s Republic of China are the two nations that have the highest collaboration in this research field. Additionally, keyword analysis depicts five distinct research strands, identifies gaps in each strand and provides a road map for future studies. Originality/value Gender diversity on the board, one of the determinants of board structure, has been highly emphasized in previous reviews. However, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, no study attempts to provide valuable insights into the development of board structure research through bibliometric review. It also offers future research avenues in this specific realm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Modelling in Management
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jm2-03-2024-0075
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unveiling the knowledge structure of corporate governance and board structure: a bibliometric analysis

Mahender Yadav, Joseph Amankwah‐Amoah, Shallu Batra, Vaibhav Aggarwal et al.
1 citations
Journal of Modelling in Management
Corporate Finance and Governance
3.91
article

Unveiling the knowledge structure of corporate governance and board structure: a bibliometric analysis

Mahender Yadav, Joseph Amankwah‐Amoah, Shallu Batra, Vaibhav Aggarwal, Albert Danso
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine the present state of board structure studies while examining current trends in research and potential future paths. Design/methodology/approach The study builds upon the articles indexed in the Web of Science database. A systematic search of the articles was conducted using the keywords search string. After using all exclusion criteria, 1,265 research papers were retrieved for analysis. RStudio combined with VOSviewer was used for network analysis and content analysis. Findings The results of the study reveal that the knowledge base of board structure had grown exponentially over time. The USA, the UK and Australia are the top three leading countries, and also the USA and the People’s Republic of China are the two nations that have the highest collaboration in this research field. Additionally, keyword analysis depicts five distinct research strands, identifies gaps in each strand and provides a road map for future studies. Originality/value Gender diversity on the board, one of the determinants of board structure, has been highly emphasized in previous reviews. However, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, no study attempts to provide valuable insights into the development of board structure research through bibliometric review. It also offers future research avenues in this specific realm.

Journal of Modelling in ManagementVol. 20(5)
Durham University (GB), Fortune Institute of International Business (IN), O. P. Jindal Global University (IN), De Montfort University (GB), Maharshi Dayanand University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Corporate Finance and Governance
3.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.