Optimizing Methanol Injection Quantity for Gas Hydrate Inhibition Using Machine Learning Models

Estimating the minimal methanol required to inhibit gas hydrate formation in pipelines is vital for operational efficiency, cost reduction, and sustainability. This task is complex due to dynamic variables like flow rate, temperature, pressure, gas specific gravity, and water content. Machine learning offers a robust solution by leveraging pipeline condition data to effectively forecast methanol needs. We evaluated four models—extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), and k-nearest neighbors (KNN)—to predict the methanol quantities required for hydrate prevention in gas pipelines. Using a dataset of 74,000 samples, with 80% for training and 20% for testing, we enhanced model robustness with 50 Monte Carlo iterations and tenfold cross-validation. The results revealed that XGBoost was the top performer in precision and consistency, surpassing the others. The performance rankings, based on the adjusted R-squared (adj. R2), mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean square error (RMSE), were KNN < DT < RF < XGBoost. A feature analysis highlighted flow rate and temperature as dominant influencers of methanol needs. These findings support real-time methanol optimization in pipelines, enhancing safety and efficiency. A correlation analysis showed that flow rate positively boosted methanol demand while temperature reduced it, with pressure, gas specific gravity, and water content exerting milder positive effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15063229
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing Methanol Injection Quantity for Gas Hydrate Inhibition Using Machine Learning Models

Weiqin Li, Mohammed Hilal Mukhsaf, Ghassan Husham Jani
2 citations
Applied Sciences
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
1.73
article

Optimizing Methanol Injection Quantity for Gas Hydrate Inhibition Using Machine Learning Models

Weiqin Li, Mohammed Hilal Mukhsaf, Ghassan Husham Jani
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Estimating the minimal methanol required to inhibit gas hydrate formation in pipelines is vital for operational efficiency, cost reduction, and sustainability. This task is complex due to dynamic variables like flow rate, temperature, pressure, gas specific gravity, and water content. Machine learning offers a robust solution by leveraging pipeline condition data to effectively forecast methanol needs. We evaluated four models—extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), and k-nearest neighbors (KNN)—to predict the methanol quantities required for hydrate prevention in gas pipelines. Using a dataset of 74,000 samples, with 80% for training and 20% for testing, we enhanced model robustness with 50 Monte Carlo iterations and tenfold cross-validation. The results revealed that XGBoost was the top performer in precision and consistency, surpassing the others. The performance rankings, based on the adjusted R-squared (adj. R2), mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean square error (RMSE), were KNN < DT < RF < XGBoost. A feature analysis highlighted flow rate and temperature as dominant influencers of methanol needs. These findings support real-time methanol optimization in pipelines, enhancing safety and efficiency. A correlation analysis showed that flow rate positively boosted methanol demand while temperature reduced it, with pressure, gas specific gravity, and water content exerting milder positive effects.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(6)
Southwest Petroleum University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
1.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.