The Expansion of Higher Education in Colombia: Bad Students or Bad Programs?

Abstract A rapid expansion in demand for post-secondary education triggered an unprecedented boom in higher education programs in Colombia, raising concerns about their pertinence and quality. This paper shows that the penalty on student learning and labor-market outcomes of attending a recently created program is large but, to a large extent, driven by student and program selection. Using rich administrative data that match higher education school admission information, socioeconomic characteristics of the young graduates, standardized test scores pre- and post-higher education, and formal labor-market outcomes, we characterize this selection process, disentangling the relative roles of demand and supply forces. The main factor behind the learning penalty is student selection in baseline ability. In the case of labor-market outcomes, the penalty is due to a combination of student and program characteristics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The World Bank Economic Review
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhaf006
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Educational Outcomes and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Expansion of Higher Education in Colombia: Bad Students or Bad Programs?

Adriana Camacho, Julián Messina, Juan Pablo Uribe
2 citations
The World Bank Economic Review
Educational Outcomes and Influences
17.85
article

The Expansion of Higher Education in Colombia: Bad Students or Bad Programs?

Adriana Camacho, Julián Messina, Juan Pablo Uribe
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract A rapid expansion in demand for post-secondary education triggered an unprecedented boom in higher education programs in Colombia, raising concerns about their pertinence and quality. This paper shows that the penalty on student learning and labor-market outcomes of attending a recently created program is large but, to a large extent, driven by student and program selection. Using rich administrative data that match higher education school admission information, socioeconomic characteristics of the young graduates, standardized test scores pre- and post-higher education, and formal labor-market outcomes, we characterize this selection process, disentangling the relative roles of demand and supply forces. The main factor behind the learning penalty is student selection in baseline ability. In the case of labor-market outcomes, the penalty is due to a combination of student and program characteristics.

The World Bank Economic ReviewVol. 40(1)
University of Alicante (ES), CAF – Development Bank of Latin America (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Educational Outcomes and Influences
17.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.