A Study on the Microstructure and Properties of Cu-Fe-Mg-Ti Alloys Based on Composition Regulation

This study systematically investigates how Fe-Ti atomic ratios (1:1, 1:2, and 2:1) influence the microstructure, mechanical properties, and softening resistance of Cu-Fe-Mg-Ti alloys under fixed total Fe + Ti content. Through hardness testing, electrical conductivity measurements, and multiscale characterization (optical microscopy, scanning/transmission electron microscopy, and X-ray diffraction), we reveal a previously unreported phenomenon: Ti-dominated ratios (1:2) enable superior strength-conductivity synergy. After 70% cold rolling and 550 °C aging, the alloy with a 2:1 Fe/Ti ratio exhibits peak hardness (166.5 HV) and conductivity (64.1% IACS), outperforming both 1:1 (173.9 HV, 51.3% IACS) and 1:2 (189.5 HV, 44.2% IACS) counterparts. Critical microstructure analysis confirms that increased Ti content promotes high-density Fe<sub>2</sub>Ti nanoprecipitation (5-15 nm) with coherent interfaces, enhancing strength while mitigating electron scattering. This work establishes atomic ratio optimization as a novel strategy to break the traditional strength-conductivity trade-off in copper alloys, providing a 21% hardness improvement over conventional Fe-Ti systems without sacrificing essential electrical performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18061325
Primary Topic
Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Study on the Microstructure and Properties of Cu-Fe-Mg-Ti Alloys Based on Composition Regulation

Jinshui Chen, Xiangpeng Xiao, Dawei Yuan, Yu Ding
1 links
Materials
Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
article

A Study on the Microstructure and Properties of Cu-Fe-Mg-Ti Alloys Based on Composition Regulation

Jinshui Chen, Xiangpeng Xiao, Dawei Yuan, Yu Ding
article en

Abstract

This study systematically investigates how Fe-Ti atomic ratios (1:1, 1:2, and 2:1) influence the microstructure, mechanical properties, and softening resistance of Cu-Fe-Mg-Ti alloys under fixed total Fe + Ti content. Through hardness testing, electrical conductivity measurements, and multiscale characterization (optical microscopy, scanning/transmission electron microscopy, and X-ray diffraction), we reveal a previously unreported phenomenon: Ti-dominated ratios (1:2) enable superior strength-conductivity synergy. After 70% cold rolling and 550 °C aging, the alloy with a 2:1 Fe/Ti ratio exhibits peak hardness (166.5 HV) and conductivity (64.1% IACS), outperforming both 1:1 (173.9 HV, 51.3% IACS) and 1:2 (189.5 HV, 44.2% IACS) counterparts. Critical microstructure analysis confirms that increased Ti content promotes high-density Fe<sub>2</sub>Ti nanoprecipitation (5-15 nm) with coherent interfaces, enhancing strength while mitigating electron scattering. This work establishes atomic ratio optimization as a novel strategy to break the traditional strength-conductivity trade-off in copper alloys, providing a 21% hardness improvement over conventional Fe-Ti systems without sacrificing essential electrical performance.

MaterialsVol. 18(6)
Jiangxi University of Science and Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Study on the Microstructure and Properties of Cu-Fe-Mg-Ti Alloys Based on Composition Regulation — Jinshui Chen, Xiangpeng Xiao, et al. · Materials (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS