Yielding Behaviors of Right-Turn-on-Red Drivers to a White Cane User

Abstract This study tested the null hypothesis that drivers turning right-on-red will not yield (defined as declining to turn during an acceptable gap) more often when a pedestrian who used a cane was present. The researchers recorded and evaluated drivers’ gap acceptance (N=93) under three conditions: with and without a pedestrian presence at the crosswalk, and with a pedestrian present using a flagging cane strategy. Results: When there was no pedestrian present, drivers did not accept the gap (yielded) 46.7% of the time; when a pedestrian was present 25%, and when the pedestrian flagged with a cane was at the corner, significantly more at 90.3% (p < .001). Discussion: The findings indicate that even when drivers are monitoring for a traffic gap to their left side at a red signal, pedestrians who are blind using a cane with movement may increase the likelihood of vehicles yielding as they prepare and initiate a crossing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Orientation & Mobility
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/vri-2024-0008
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Yielding Behaviors of Right-Turn-on-Red Drivers to a White Cane User

Lukas Franck, Dona Sauerburger, Robert Wall Emerson, Joy Bieder et al.
International Journal of Orientation & Mobility
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Yielding Behaviors of Right-Turn-on-Red Drivers to a White Cane User

Lukas Franck, Dona Sauerburger, Robert Wall Emerson, Joy Bieder, Eugene Bourquin, Debbie Fiderer
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study tested the null hypothesis that drivers turning right-on-red will not yield (defined as declining to turn during an acceptable gap) more often when a pedestrian who used a cane was present. The researchers recorded and evaluated drivers’ gap acceptance (N=93) under three conditions: with and without a pedestrian presence at the crosswalk, and with a pedestrian present using a flagging cane strategy. Results: When there was no pedestrian present, drivers did not accept the gap (yielded) 46.7% of the time; when a pedestrian was present 25%, and when the pedestrian flagged with a cane was at the corner, significantly more at 90.3% (p < .001). Discussion: The findings indicate that even when drivers are monitoring for a traffic gap to their left side at a red signal, pedestrians who are blind using a cane with movement may increase the likelihood of vehicles yielding as they prepare and initiate a crossing.

International Journal of Orientation & MobilityVol. 15(1)
Helen Keller International (US), Western Michigan University (US), Independent Sector (US), RED Consulting (Norway) (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.