Prevalence of Text Neck Between Different Female Students at Taibah University, Saudi Arabia; Cross Section Design

<b>Background</b>: Text neck is a common postural malalignment that significantly affects daily activities. Reliable and user-friendly assessment tools are essential for physiotherapists, and evaluating text neck prevalence in both sitting and standing positions is crucial for effective rehabilitation. This study aimed to compare text neck prevalence between students in practical and non-practical disciplines using multiple assessment methods. <b>Methodology</b>: A total of 82 female students (18-24 years) from Taibah University participated. The practical group included students from the Colleges of Medical Rehabilitation Sciences and Applied Medical Sciences, who engage in hands-on learning. The non-practical group consisted of Business Administration students, whose coursework is primarily theoretical. Text neck was assessed using observational methods, tragus to wall distance (TWD), craniovertebral angle (CVA) via a smartphone application, and PostureCo in both sitting and standing positions. <b>Results</b>: Observational assessment showed text neck prevalence of 95.5% in the non-practical group and 70% in the practical group while sitting, and 91% versus 80% while standing. Based on TWD, prevalence was 48% in non-practical students and 32% in practical students. Using Physiomaster, prevalence was 71% in standing and 54% in sitting for non-practical students, compared to 39% and 14%, respectively, for practical students. Significant differences were found between groups in sitting (<i>p</i> < 0.002) and standing (<i>p</i> < 0.001) using TWD, and in CVA measurements (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). <b>Conclusions</b>: Text neck is more prevalent among non-practical students, while practical students exhibit milder cases. Both sitting and standing assessments are essential for accurate diagnosis and rehabilitation planning. Future studies should analyze the accuracy of various measurement tools to identify the most precise methods for assessing text neck prevalence, taking into consideration both sitting and standing positions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13060651
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prevalence of Text Neck Between Different Female Students at Taibah University, Saudi Arabia; Cross Section Design

Walaa M. Ragab, Abdullah M. Al-Shenqiti, Abdulrhman Mashabi, Marwan Mahmoud Aljohani et al.
Healthcare
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Prevalence of Text Neck Between Different Female Students at Taibah University, Saudi Arabia; Cross Section Design

Walaa M. Ragab, Abdullah M. Al-Shenqiti, Abdulrhman Mashabi, Marwan Mahmoud Aljohani, Ghaida Alrayes, Joud Amoudi, Soundos Tokhta, Ghaida Bashawri, Ruqayyah Alqaznili, Jana Ghaith, Lama Almadani
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Text neck is a common postural malalignment that significantly affects daily activities. Reliable and user-friendly assessment tools are essential for physiotherapists, and evaluating text neck prevalence in both sitting and standing positions is crucial for effective rehabilitation. This study aimed to compare text neck prevalence between students in practical and non-practical disciplines using multiple assessment methods. <b>Methodology</b>: A total of 82 female students (18-24 years) from Taibah University participated. The practical group included students from the Colleges of Medical Rehabilitation Sciences and Applied Medical Sciences, who engage in hands-on learning. The non-practical group consisted of Business Administration students, whose coursework is primarily theoretical. Text neck was assessed using observational methods, tragus to wall distance (TWD), craniovertebral angle (CVA) via a smartphone application, and PostureCo in both sitting and standing positions. <b>Results</b>: Observational assessment showed text neck prevalence of 95.5% in the non-practical group and 70% in the practical group while sitting, and 91% versus 80% while standing. Based on TWD, prevalence was 48% in non-practical students and 32% in practical students. Using Physiomaster, prevalence was 71% in standing and 54% in sitting for non-practical students, compared to 39% and 14%, respectively, for practical students. Significant differences were found between groups in sitting (<i>p</i> < 0.002) and standing (<i>p</i> < 0.001) using TWD, and in CVA measurements (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). <b>Conclusions</b>: Text neck is more prevalent among non-practical students, while practical students exhibit milder cases. Both sitting and standing assessments are essential for accurate diagnosis and rehabilitation planning. Future studies should analyze the accuracy of various measurement tools to identify the most precise methods for assessing text neck prevalence, taking into consideration both sitting and standing positions.

HealthcareVol. 13(6)
Taibah University (SA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.