Re-Evaluating the Instrumental Magnitude of the Destructive 28 December 1908 Messina Earthquake (Southern Italy)

Abstract An accurate re-evaluation of the instrumental magnitude has been performed for the 28 December 1908 Messina Straits earthquake (Southern Italy), one of the most destructive events ever recorded in the Mediterranean region. Despite the crucial importance of this earthquake for seismic hazard assessment, magnitude values reported in the literature show a wide range of variability, reflecting the inherent uncertainties typical of early instrumental data. This variability suggests the need of a rigorous revision of data and methods used for magnitude estimation. With this purpose, we (1) conducted a comprehensive collection and critical analysis of analog seismograms and station bulletins available for the 1908 event, and (2) rigorously applied the most recently revised approaches for determining body- and surface-wave magnitudes of historical events, also following the recommendations of the International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth’s Interior. We present the re-estimation of the body-wave magnitude “mB” using the original Gutenberg–Richter formula, and the surface-wave magnitude “Ms” employing both the “Moscow–Prague” formula and the approach proposed by Abe and Noguchi in 1983. Moreover, this study represents the first instance in which data from undamped instruments have been incorporated into reassessment of this magnitude. The results of our analysis suggest a more reliable final magnitude range between 6.9 and 7.0 for the 1908 earthquake and also emphasize the importance of using consistent and rigorous methodologies in historical seismic research for contributing to more accurate assessments of seismic hazard evaluations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Seismological Research Letters
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1785/0220240447
Citations
1
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Re-Evaluating the Instrumental Magnitude of the Destructive 28 December 1908 Messina Earthquake (Southern Italy)

Josep Batlló, B. Orecchio, Cristina Totaro, Silvia Scolaro et al.
1 citations
Seismological Research Letters
earthquake and tectonic studies
1.87
article

Re-Evaluating the Instrumental Magnitude of the Destructive 28 December 1908 Messina Earthquake (Southern Italy)

Josep Batlló, B. Orecchio, Cristina Totaro, Silvia Scolaro, Debora Presti
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract An accurate re-evaluation of the instrumental magnitude has been performed for the 28 December 1908 Messina Straits earthquake (Southern Italy), one of the most destructive events ever recorded in the Mediterranean region. Despite the crucial importance of this earthquake for seismic hazard assessment, magnitude values reported in the literature show a wide range of variability, reflecting the inherent uncertainties typical of early instrumental data. This variability suggests the need of a rigorous revision of data and methods used for magnitude estimation. With this purpose, we (1) conducted a comprehensive collection and critical analysis of analog seismograms and station bulletins available for the 1908 event, and (2) rigorously applied the most recently revised approaches for determining body- and surface-wave magnitudes of historical events, also following the recommendations of the International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth’s Interior. We present the re-estimation of the body-wave magnitude “mB” using the original Gutenberg–Richter formula, and the surface-wave magnitude “Ms” employing both the “Moscow–Prague” formula and the approach proposed by Abe and Noguchi in 1983. Moreover, this study represents the first instance in which data from undamped instruments have been incorporated into reassessment of this magnitude. The results of our analysis suggest a more reliable final magnitude range between 6.9 and 7.0 for the 1908 earthquake and also emphasize the importance of using consistent and rigorous methodologies in historical seismic research for contributing to more accurate assessments of seismic hazard evaluations.

Seismological Research LettersVol. 96(4)
University of Messina (IT), Institut Cartogràfic i Geològic de Catalunya (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
earthquake and tectonic studies
1.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.