The effect of public procurement processes on the performance of public projects

This study investigates the impact of public procurement procedures on the efficacy of public projects within Zambia's Ministry of Infrastructure, Housing and Urban Development (MIHUD) and the Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development (MLGRD). Inefficient procurement methods, characterised by delays, cost overruns, and inferior project quality, have impeded the successful execution of public projects, especially in infrastructure and rural development. The research is to evaluate the impact of Supplier Qualification Screening (SQS), Competitive Bidding (CB), and Supplier Evaluation (SE) on project performance. A quantitative research methodology was utilised, employing a survey-based descriptive design to gather data from 120 procurement experts and project managers within the designated ministries. Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) was employed to examine the correlations between procurement methods and project outcomes. The results demonstrate that SQS and CB enhance project performance by facilitating timely delivery and cost effectiveness. Nonetheless, SE exerted a detrimental impact, indicating that too rigorous evaluation processes may result in delays and impede project accomplishment. Hypothesis testing validated these findings, corroborating the alternative hypotheses for SQS and CB, however SE demonstrated an inverse correlation with project outcomes. The report advocates for the fortification of regulatory frameworks, the augmentation of capacity-building programs, the rectification of bureaucratic inefficiencies, and the encouragement of e-procurement platform usage to enhance procurement efficiency. A review of supplier evaluation procedures is essential to avert needless delays in project execution. The study's results have substantial implications for procurement reforms and efficiency enhancements in Zambia. Improving openness, accountability, and stakeholder collaboration in procurement procedures can result in superior project outcomes, fostering national infrastructure development and socio-economic advancement, especially in rural regions. Enhancing procurement policies and using digital solutions will be crucial in developing a more efficient and accountable public procurement system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bussecon Review of Social Sciences (2687-2285)
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36096/brss.v7i1.709
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Public Procurement and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of public procurement processes on the performance of public projects

Erastus Mwanaumo, Bupe Getrude Mwanza, Mahongo Katamuna
1 citations
Bussecon Review of Social Sciences (2687-2285)
Public Procurement and Policy
2.23
article

The effect of public procurement processes on the performance of public projects

Erastus Mwanaumo, Bupe Getrude Mwanza, Mahongo Katamuna
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of public procurement procedures on the efficacy of public projects within Zambia's Ministry of Infrastructure, Housing and Urban Development (MIHUD) and the Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development (MLGRD). Inefficient procurement methods, characterised by delays, cost overruns, and inferior project quality, have impeded the successful execution of public projects, especially in infrastructure and rural development. The research is to evaluate the impact of Supplier Qualification Screening (SQS), Competitive Bidding (CB), and Supplier Evaluation (SE) on project performance. A quantitative research methodology was utilised, employing a survey-based descriptive design to gather data from 120 procurement experts and project managers within the designated ministries. Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) was employed to examine the correlations between procurement methods and project outcomes. The results demonstrate that SQS and CB enhance project performance by facilitating timely delivery and cost effectiveness. Nonetheless, SE exerted a detrimental impact, indicating that too rigorous evaluation processes may result in delays and impede project accomplishment. Hypothesis testing validated these findings, corroborating the alternative hypotheses for SQS and CB, however SE demonstrated an inverse correlation with project outcomes. The report advocates for the fortification of regulatory frameworks, the augmentation of capacity-building programs, the rectification of bureaucratic inefficiencies, and the encouragement of e-procurement platform usage to enhance procurement efficiency. A review of supplier evaluation procedures is essential to avert needless delays in project execution. The study's results have substantial implications for procurement reforms and efficiency enhancements in Zambia. Improving openness, accountability, and stakeholder collaboration in procurement procedures can result in superior project outcomes, fostering national infrastructure development and socio-economic advancement, especially in rural regions. Enhancing procurement policies and using digital solutions will be crucial in developing a more efficient and accountable public procurement system.

Bussecon Review of Social Sciences (2687-2285)Vol. 7(1)
University of Zambia (ZM)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Public Procurement and Policy
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.