Climate change, managerial ownership, and agency conflicts: insights from the Paris Agreement

Guided by agency theory, we examine how managerial ownership affects shareholder value around the Paris Agreement's adoption. Our findings suggest that higher managerial ownership reduces shareholder wealth in firms highly exposed to climate change, indicating agency conflicts. Managers with large ownership stakes may prioritize personal interests over climate responsibility, harming shareholder value. The key driver of this effect is new business opportunities related to climate change, which typically enhance shareholder value but are overlooked when managers hold significant stakes. This highlights an ethical dilemma where managers may forgo sustainable opportunities for personal gain. However, managerial ownership does not influence decisions related to physical and regulatory climate risks, likely because these risks are immediate and unavoidable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2025.2479554
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Climate change, managerial ownership, and agency conflicts: insights from the Paris Agreement

Pandej Chintrakarn, Viput Ongsakul, Pattanaporn Chatjuthamard, Pornsit Jiraporn et al.
2 citations
Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment
Climate Change Policy and Economics
6.26
article

Climate change, managerial ownership, and agency conflicts: insights from the Paris Agreement

Pandej Chintrakarn, Viput Ongsakul, Pattanaporn Chatjuthamard, Pornsit Jiraporn, Sang Mook Lee
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Guided by agency theory, we examine how managerial ownership affects shareholder value around the Paris Agreement's adoption. Our findings suggest that higher managerial ownership reduces shareholder wealth in firms highly exposed to climate change, indicating agency conflicts. Managers with large ownership stakes may prioritize personal interests over climate responsibility, harming shareholder value. The key driver of this effect is new business opportunities related to climate change, which typically enhance shareholder value but are overlooked when managers hold significant stakes. This highlights an ethical dilemma where managers may forgo sustainable opportunities for personal gain. However, managerial ownership does not influence decisions related to physical and regulatory climate risks, likely because these risks are immediate and unavoidable.

Journal of Sustainable Finance & InvestmentVol. 15(2)
Pennsylvania State University (US), Chulalongkorn University (TH), National Institute of Development Administration (TH), Mahidol University (TH), Hodges University (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Climate change, managerial ownership, and agency conflicts: insights from the Paris Agreement — Pandej Chintrakarn, Viput Ongsakul, et al. · Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS