Does Adherence to Treatment Guidelines from the Ghailane–Gille Classification for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis of the Lumbar Spine Impact Surgical Outcomes? A Match–Mismatch Study

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: satisfactory sagittal alignment when treating degenerative spondylolisthesis of the lumbar spine (DSLS) may produce better clinical and radiographic outcomes compared to treatment focused solely on isolated segments when indicated. Ghailane et al. proposed a treatment guideline based on their classification system. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of adherence to Ghailane-Gille (GG) treatment guidelines on surgical outcomes in patients with DSLS. <b>Methods</b>: A monocentric retrospective cohort analysis was performed from 2021 to September 2024. Data were collected from patients treated for DSLS, covering the period from baseline to one-year follow-up. Patients were divided into two groups based on GG treatment guidelines: the "Match group" (patients who underwent surgery following GG guidelines) and the "Mismatch group" (patients who did not adhere to these guidelines). Preoperative and postoperative clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and operative parameters were collected and compared between groups. <b>Results</b>: A total of 80 patients were enrolled, with 52 in the Match group and 28 in the Mismatch group. At baseline, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score demonstrated significant variation among classification subtypes and a positive correlation. The Match group exhibited a significant reduction in ODI scores one year postoperatively and maintained high levels of satisfaction; no significant intraoperative differences were noted. Additionally, patients in the Mismatch group were more frequently classified as <i>American Society of Anesthesiologists</i> (<i>ASA</i>) III compared to the Match group (70% vs. 30%), suggesting clinicians' hesitance to fully implement GG guidelines in aggressive treatment strategies for those patients. <b>Conclusions</b>: Adhering to the GG treatment guidelines for restoring sagittal alignment in DSLS patients is associated with decreased ODI scores regardless of age, ensuring patient satisfaction at one-year follow-up. This approach could potentially benefit ASA III patients as well.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14062041
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Adherence to Treatment Guidelines from the Ghailane–Gille Classification for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis of the Lumbar Spine Impact Surgical Outcomes? A Match–Mismatch Study

Castelain Jean Etienne, Chantal Matthieu, Vincent Challier, Soufiane Ghailane et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Does Adherence to Treatment Guidelines from the Ghailane–Gille Classification for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis of the Lumbar Spine Impact Surgical Outcomes? A Match–Mismatch Study

Castelain Jean Etienne, Chantal Matthieu, Vincent Challier, Soufiane Ghailane, J. L. Clement, Olivier Gille, Bouloussa Houssam
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: satisfactory sagittal alignment when treating degenerative spondylolisthesis of the lumbar spine (DSLS) may produce better clinical and radiographic outcomes compared to treatment focused solely on isolated segments when indicated. Ghailane et al. proposed a treatment guideline based on their classification system. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of adherence to Ghailane-Gille (GG) treatment guidelines on surgical outcomes in patients with DSLS. <b>Methods</b>: A monocentric retrospective cohort analysis was performed from 2021 to September 2024. Data were collected from patients treated for DSLS, covering the period from baseline to one-year follow-up. Patients were divided into two groups based on GG treatment guidelines: the "Match group" (patients who underwent surgery following GG guidelines) and the "Mismatch group" (patients who did not adhere to these guidelines). Preoperative and postoperative clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and operative parameters were collected and compared between groups. <b>Results</b>: A total of 80 patients were enrolled, with 52 in the Match group and 28 in the Mismatch group. At baseline, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score demonstrated significant variation among classification subtypes and a positive correlation. The Match group exhibited a significant reduction in ODI scores one year postoperatively and maintained high levels of satisfaction; no significant intraoperative differences were noted. Additionally, patients in the Mismatch group were more frequently classified as <i>American Society of Anesthesiologists</i> (<i>ASA</i>) III compared to the Match group (70% vs. 30%), suggesting clinicians' hesitance to fully implement GG guidelines in aggressive treatment strategies for those patients. <b>Conclusions</b>: Adhering to the GG treatment guidelines for restoring sagittal alignment in DSLS patients is associated with decreased ODI scores regardless of age, ensuring patient satisfaction at one-year follow-up. This approach could potentially benefit ASA III patients as well.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(6)
Université de Bordeaux (FR), Hôpital Privé Jacques Cartier (FR), University of Missouri–Kansas City (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.