Revisiting heavy-flavor conserving weak decays of charmed baryons within the nonrelativistic quark model

In this work, we investigate the heavy-flavor conserving weak decays of charmed baryons, specifically the processes <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mrow><a:msub><a:mrow><a:mi mathvariant="normal">Ξ</a:mi></a:mrow><a:mrow><a:mi>c</a:mi></a:mrow></a:msub><a:mo stretchy="false">→</a:mo><a:msub><a:mrow><a:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</a:mi></a:mrow><a:mrow><a:mi>c</a:mi></a:mrow></a:msub><a:mi>π</a:mi></a:mrow></a:math> and <f:math xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><f:msub><f:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</f:mi><f:mi>c</f:mi></f:msub><f:mo stretchy="false">→</f:mo><f:msub><f:mi mathvariant="normal">Ξ</f:mi><f:mi>c</f:mi></f:msub><f:mi>π</f:mi></f:math>, where the pole model is employed to account for the nonfactorizable contributions. Additionally, the nonperturbative parameters involved are determined within the framework of the nonrelativistic quark model, utilizing exact baryon wave functions obtained by solving the Schrödinger equation with a nonrelativistic potential. By considering the mixing angle <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><k:mrow><k:mi>θ</k:mi><k:mo>∈</k:mo><k:mo stretchy="false">(</k:mo><k:mn>24.4</k:mn><k:mi>°</k:mi><k:mo>,</k:mo><k:mn>32.4</k:mn><k:mi>°</k:mi><k:mo stretchy="false">)</k:mo></k:mrow></k:math> for <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><o:msub><o:mi mathvariant="normal">Ξ</o:mi><o:mi>c</o:mi></o:msub><o:mo>−</o:mo><o:msubsup><o:mi mathvariant="normal">Ξ</o:mi><o:mi>c</o:mi><o:mo>′</o:mo></o:msubsup></o:math> mixing, we find that the experimental data can be effectively reproduced. Furthermore, we estimate the branching ratios: <s:math xmlns:s="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><s:mrow><s:mi mathvariant="script">B</s:mi><s:mo stretchy="false">(</s:mo><s:msubsup><s:mrow><s:mi mathvariant="normal">Ξ</s:mi></s:mrow><s:mrow><s:mi>c</s:mi></s:mrow><s:mrow><s:mo>+</s:mo></s:mrow></s:msubsup><s:mo stretchy="false">→</s:mo><s:msubsup><s:mrow><s:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</s:mi></s:mrow><s:mrow><s:mi>c</s:mi></s:mrow><s:mrow><s:mo>+</s:mo></s:mrow></s:msubsup><s:msup><s:mrow><s:mi>π</s:mi></s:mrow><s:mrow><s:mn>0</s:mn></s:mrow></s:msup><s:mo stretchy="false">)</s:mo><s:mo>=</s:mo><s:mo stretchy="false">(</s:mo><s:mn>8.69</s:mn><s:mi>–</s:mi><s:mn>9.79</s:mn><s:mo stretchy="false">)</s:mo><s:mo>×</s:mo><s:msup><s:mrow><s:mn>10</s:mn></s:mrow><s:mrow><s:mo>−</s:mo><s:mn>3</s:mn></s:mrow></s:msup></s:mrow></s:math>, <cb:math xmlns:cb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><cb:mrow><cb:mi mathvariant="script">B</cb:mi><cb:mo stretchy="false">(</cb:mo><cb:msubsup><cb:mrow><cb:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</cb:mi></cb:mrow><cb:mrow><cb:mi>c</cb:mi></cb:mrow><cb:mrow><cb:mn>0</cb:mn></cb:mrow></cb:msubsup><cb:mo stretchy="false">→</cb:mo><cb:msubsup><cb:mrow><cb:mi mathvariant="normal">Ξ</cb:mi></cb:mrow><cb:mrow><cb:mi>c</cb:mi></cb:mrow><cb:mrow><cb:mo>+</cb:mo></cb:mrow></cb:msubsup><cb:msup><cb:mrow><cb:mi>π</cb:mi></cb:mrow><cb:mrow><cb:mo>−</cb:mo></cb:mrow></cb:msup><cb:mo stretchy="false">)</cb:mo><cb:mo>=</cb:mo><cb:mo stretchy="false">(</cb:mo><cb:mn>11.3</cb:mn><cb:mi>–</cb:mi><cb:mn>12.1</cb:mn><cb:mo stretchy="false">)</cb:mo><cb:mo>×</cb:mo><cb:msup><cb:mrow><cb:mn>10</cb:mn></cb:mrow><cb:mrow><cb:mo>−</cb:mo><cb:mn>3</cb:mn></cb:mrow></cb:msup></cb:mrow></cb:math>, and <mb:math xmlns:mb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mb:mrow><mb:mi mathvariant="script">B</mb:mi><mb:mo stretchy="false">(</mb:mo><mb:msubsup><mb:mrow><mb:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mb:mi></mb:mrow><mb:mrow><mb:mi>c</mb:mi></mb:mrow><mb:mrow><mb:mn>0</mb:mn></mb:mrow></mb:msubsup><mb:mo stretchy="false">→</mb:mo><mb:msubsup><mb:mrow><mb:mi mathvariant="normal">Ξ</mb:mi></mb:mrow><mb:mrow><mb:mi>c</mb:mi></mb:mrow><mb:mrow><mb:mn>0</mb:mn></mb:mrow></mb:msubsup><mb:msup><mb:mrow><mb:mi>π</mb:mi></mb:mrow><mb:mrow><mb:mn>0</mb:mn></mb:mrow></mb:msup><mb:mo stretchy="false">)</mb:mo><mb:mo>=</mb:mo><mb:mo stretchy="false">(</mb:mo><mb:mn>4.67</mb:mn><mb:mi>–</mb:mi><mb:mn>5.23</mb:mn><mb:mo stretchy="false">)</mb:mo><mb:mo>×</mb:mo><mb:msup><mb:mrow><mb:mn>10</mb:mn></mb:mrow><mb:mrow><mb:mo>−</mb:mo><mb:mn>3</mb:mn></mb:mrow></mb:msup></mb:mrow></mb:math>. These predictions can be tested in ongoing experiments at LHCb, Belle II, and BESIII.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.111.053004
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.74

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting heavy-flavor conserving weak decays of charmed baryons within the nonrelativistic quark model

Xiang Liu, Yu-Shuai Li
2 citations
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
3.74
article

Revisiting heavy-flavor conserving weak decays of charmed baryons within the nonrelativistic quark model

Xiang Liu, Yu-Shuai Li
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In this work, we investigate the heavy-flavor conserving weak decays of charmed baryons, specifically the processes <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mrow><a:msub><a:mrow><a:mi mathvariant="normal">Ξ</a:mi></a:mrow><a:mrow><a:mi>c</a:mi></a:mrow></a:msub><a:mo stretchy="false">→</a:mo><a:msub><a:mrow><a:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</a:mi></a:mrow><a:mrow><a:mi>c</a:mi></a:mrow></a:msub><a:mi>π</a:mi></a:mrow></a:math> and <f:math xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><f:msub><f:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</f:mi><f:mi>c</f:mi></f:msub><f:mo stretchy="false">→</f:mo><f:msub><f:mi mathvariant="normal">Ξ</f:mi><f:mi>c</f:mi></f:msub><f:mi>π</f:mi></f:math>, where the pole model is employed to account for the nonfactorizable contributions. Additionally, the nonperturbative parameters involved are determined within the framework of the nonrelativistic quark model, utilizing exact baryon wave functions obtained by solving the Schrödinger equation with a nonrelativistic potential. By considering the mixing angle <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><k:mrow><k:mi>θ</k:mi><k:mo>∈</k:mo><k:mo stretchy="false">(</k:mo><k:mn>24.4</k:mn><k:mi>°</k:mi><k:mo>,</k:mo><k:mn>32.4</k:mn><k:mi>°</k:mi><k:mo stretchy="false">)</k:mo></k:mrow></k:math> for <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><o:msub><o:mi mathvariant="normal">Ξ</o:mi><o:mi>c</o:mi></o:msub><o:mo>−</o:mo><o:msubsup><o:mi mathvariant="normal">Ξ</o:mi><o:mi>c</o:mi><o:mo>′</o:mo></o:msubsup></o:math> mixing, we find that the experimental data can be effectively reproduced. Furthermore, we estimate the branching ratios: <s:math xmlns:s="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><s:mrow><s:mi mathvariant="script">B</s:mi><s:mo stretchy="false">(</s:mo><s:msubsup><s:mrow><s:mi mathvariant="normal">Ξ</s:mi></s:mrow><s:mrow><s:mi>c</s:mi></s:mrow><s:mrow><s:mo>+</s:mo></s:mrow></s:msubsup><s:mo stretchy="false">→</s:mo><s:msubsup><s:mrow><s:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</s:mi></s:mrow><s:mrow><s:mi>c</s:mi></s:mrow><s:mrow><s:mo>+</s:mo></s:mrow></s:msubsup><s:msup><s:mrow><s:mi>π</s:mi></s:mrow><s:mrow><s:mn>0</s:mn></s:mrow></s:msup><s:mo stretchy="false">)</s:mo><s:mo>=</s:mo><s:mo stretchy="false">(</s:mo><s:mn>8.69</s:mn><s:mi>–</s:mi><s:mn>9.79</s:mn><s:mo stretchy="false">)</s:mo><s:mo>×</s:mo><s:msup><s:mrow><s:mn>10</s:mn></s:mrow><s:mrow><s:mo>−</s:mo><s:mn>3</s:mn></s:mrow></s:msup></s:mrow></s:math>, <cb:math xmlns:cb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><cb:mrow><cb:mi mathvariant="script">B</cb:mi><cb:mo stretchy="false">(</cb:mo><cb:msubsup><cb:mrow><cb:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</cb:mi></cb:mrow><cb:mrow><cb:mi>c</cb:mi></cb:mrow><cb:mrow><cb:mn>0</cb:mn></cb:mrow></cb:msubsup><cb:mo stretchy="false">→</cb:mo><cb:msubsup><cb:mrow><cb:mi mathvariant="normal">Ξ</cb:mi></cb:mrow><cb:mrow><cb:mi>c</cb:mi></cb:mrow><cb:mrow><cb:mo>+</cb:mo></cb:mrow></cb:msubsup><cb:msup><cb:mrow><cb:mi>π</cb:mi></cb:mrow><cb:mrow><cb:mo>−</cb:mo></cb:mrow></cb:msup><cb:mo stretchy="false">)</cb:mo><cb:mo>=</cb:mo><cb:mo stretchy="false">(</cb:mo><cb:mn>11.3</cb:mn><cb:mi>–</cb:mi><cb:mn>12.1</cb:mn><cb:mo stretchy="false">)</cb:mo><cb:mo>×</cb:mo><cb:msup><cb:mrow><cb:mn>10</cb:mn></cb:mrow><cb:mrow><cb:mo>−</cb:mo><cb:mn>3</cb:mn></cb:mrow></cb:msup></cb:mrow></cb:math>, and <mb:math xmlns:mb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mb:mrow><mb:mi mathvariant="script">B</mb:mi><mb:mo stretchy="false">(</mb:mo><mb:msubsup><mb:mrow><mb:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mb:mi></mb:mrow><mb:mrow><mb:mi>c</mb:mi></mb:mrow><mb:mrow><mb:mn>0</mb:mn></mb:mrow></mb:msubsup><mb:mo stretchy="false">→</mb:mo><mb:msubsup><mb:mrow><mb:mi mathvariant="normal">Ξ</mb:mi></mb:mrow><mb:mrow><mb:mi>c</mb:mi></mb:mrow><mb:mrow><mb:mn>0</mb:mn></mb:mrow></mb:msubsup><mb:msup><mb:mrow><mb:mi>π</mb:mi></mb:mrow><mb:mrow><mb:mn>0</mb:mn></mb:mrow></mb:msup><mb:mo stretchy="false">)</mb:mo><mb:mo>=</mb:mo><mb:mo stretchy="false">(</mb:mo><mb:mn>4.67</mb:mn><mb:mi>–</mb:mi><mb:mn>5.23</mb:mn><mb:mo stretchy="false">)</mb:mo><mb:mo>×</mb:mo><mb:msup><mb:mrow><mb:mn>10</mb:mn></mb:mrow><mb:mrow><mb:mo>−</mb:mo><mb:mn>3</mb:mn></mb:mrow></mb:msup></mb:mrow></mb:math>. These predictions can be tested in ongoing experiments at LHCb, Belle II, and BESIII.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 111(5)
Peking University (CN), Institute of Modern Physics (CN), Lanzhou University (CN)
Chinese Physical Society, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Overseas Expertise Introduction Center for Discipline Innovation of Food Nutrition and Human Health (111 Center)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
3.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.