Ways of perceiving, sensory affordances: Media-ecological remarks on subverting sensor datafication

Through their focus on counter-practices, Borbach and Kanderske offer valuable methodological inspirations for research on sensor media. Above and beyond a praxeology of subversive action, their suggestions carry a number of additional media-ecological implications that revolve around the incommensurability of sensory affordances in-between human and technological actors in sensor-saturated environments. Who's to say which perceptual topologies are navigated by the numerous semi-autonomous technological actors and sensing devices sharing the same physical space with humans? And, more politically relevant, which ways of perceiving might humans already be exposed to without their awareness? A situated account of counter-practices could thus usefully be extended toward a form of interface critique that can help to surface asymmetries of perception in co-habited media ecologies and support to exploit them toward political-activist aims.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dialogues on Digital Society
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/29768640251328633
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital Media and Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ways of perceiving, sensory affordances: Media-ecological remarks on subverting sensor datafication

Timo Kærlein
1 citations
Dialogues on Digital Society
Digital Media and Philosophy
1.69
article

Ways of perceiving, sensory affordances: Media-ecological remarks on subverting sensor datafication

Timo Kærlein
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Through their focus on counter-practices, Borbach and Kanderske offer valuable methodological inspirations for research on sensor media. Above and beyond a praxeology of subversive action, their suggestions carry a number of additional media-ecological implications that revolve around the incommensurability of sensory affordances in-between human and technological actors in sensor-saturated environments. Who's to say which perceptual topologies are navigated by the numerous semi-autonomous technological actors and sensing devices sharing the same physical space with humans? And, more politically relevant, which ways of perceiving might humans already be exposed to without their awareness? A situated account of counter-practices could thus usefully be extended toward a form of interface critique that can help to surface asymmetries of perception in co-habited media ecologies and support to exploit them toward political-activist aims.

Dialogues on Digital SocietyVol. 1(2)
Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Digital Media and Philosophy
1.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.