Guidelines of the International Headache Society for Real-World Evidence studies in migraine and cluster headache

Real-world evidence studies are an important tool for investigating the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of treatments for headache disorders in clinical practice. These studies use data generated from routine clinical practice from a variety of sources and can help to identify unmet needs in headache care and guide new therapies, including populations not always included in randomized clinical trials of different ages, comorbidities, and concomitant stable treatments. Real-world evidence pertains to the clinical evidence surrounding the utilization, as well as the potential advantages or drawbacks of treatment, which is extracted through an analysis of real-world data. Real-world evidence studies can present unique challenges, including timing of data collection (prospective vs retrospective), data selection, data quality issues and potential biases (selection, confounding factors, etc.). The International Headache Society has developed these guidelines for optimizing the design and conduct of real-world evidence studies, and therefore the strength and reliability of their output.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cephalalgia
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024251318016
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Migraine and Headache Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Guidelines of the International Headache Society for Real-World Evidence studies in migraine and cluster headache

Peter J. Goadsby, Messoud Ashina, Shuu‐Jiun Wang, Hans‐Christoph Diener et al.
13 citations
Cephalalgia
Migraine and Headache Studies
19.13
article

Guidelines of the International Headache Society for Real-World Evidence studies in migraine and cluster headache

Peter J. Goadsby, Messoud Ashina, Shuu‐Jiun Wang, Hans‐Christoph Diener, Patricia Pozo‐Rosich, Cristina Tassorelli, Gisela M. Terwindt, Britt W. H. van der Arend, Marta Torres‐Ferrús, Nancy van Veelen, Gloria Vaghi, Edoardo Caronna
article en
13 citations

Abstract

Real-world evidence studies are an important tool for investigating the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of treatments for headache disorders in clinical practice. These studies use data generated from routine clinical practice from a variety of sources and can help to identify unmet needs in headache care and guide new therapies, including populations not always included in randomized clinical trials of different ages, comorbidities, and concomitant stable treatments. Real-world evidence pertains to the clinical evidence surrounding the utilization, as well as the potential advantages or drawbacks of treatment, which is extracted through an analysis of real-world data. Real-world evidence studies can present unique challenges, including timing of data collection (prospective vs retrospective), data selection, data quality issues and potential biases (selection, confounding factors, etc.). The International Headache Society has developed these guidelines for optimizing the design and conduct of real-world evidence studies, and therefore the strength and reliability of their output.

CephalalgiaVol. 45(3)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), University of Copenhagen (DK), National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW), University of California, Los Angeles (US), King's College London (GB), University of Pavia (IT), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Rigshospitalet (DK), Taipei Veterans General Hospital (TW), Fondazione Istituto Neurologico Nazionale Casimiro Mondino (IT), Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (ES), Urology Foundation (GB), Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Migraine and Headache Studies
19.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.