Diagnosability Verification and Enforcement in Labeled Petri Nets Under Sensor Attacks

This article formalizes and solves the problems of diagnosability verification and enforcement in discrete event systems modeled with labeled Petri nets (LPNs) under sensor attacks. Given a plant, attackers work as a group in the framework of a coordinated distributed architecture and have the ability to edit some sensor readings to conceal the faults to confuse the operator. Furthermore, attackers necessarily remain furtive, i.e., their presence should not be discovered by the operator. In order to describe the set of all possible furtive attacks, a joint furtive diagnoser is established. We prove that an LPN under the above attacks is diagnosable if and only if its joint furtive diagnoser does not have the cycles composed of pairs of either faulty states and normal states, or faulty states and uncertain states. A new labeling function is proposed to enforce a plant to be diagnosable against as many attacks as possible. Examples are provided to illustrate the proposed method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmc.2025.3545756
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Petri Nets in System Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.51
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnosability Verification and Enforcement in Labeled Petri Nets Under Sensor Attacks

Shaopeng Hu, Zhiwu Li, Ding Liu
3 citations
IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems
Petri Nets in System Modeling
4.51
article

Diagnosability Verification and Enforcement in Labeled Petri Nets Under Sensor Attacks

Shaopeng Hu, Zhiwu Li, Ding Liu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This article formalizes and solves the problems of diagnosability verification and enforcement in discrete event systems modeled with labeled Petri nets (LPNs) under sensor attacks. Given a plant, attackers work as a group in the framework of a coordinated distributed architecture and have the ability to edit some sensor readings to conceal the faults to confuse the operator. Furthermore, attackers necessarily remain furtive, i.e., their presence should not be discovered by the operator. In order to describe the set of all possible furtive attacks, a joint furtive diagnoser is established. We prove that an LPN under the above attacks is diagnosable if and only if its joint furtive diagnoser does not have the cycles composed of pairs of either faulty states and normal states, or faulty states and uncertain states. A new labeling function is proposed to enforce a plant to be diagnosable against as many attacks as possible. Examples are provided to illustrate the proposed method.

IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics SystemsVol. 55(5)
Xidian University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Petri Nets in System Modeling
4.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Diagnosability Verification and Enforcement in Labeled Petri Nets Under Sensor Attacks — Shaopeng Hu, Zhiwu Li, et al. · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS