Maintaining cooperation through vertical communication of trust when removing sanctions

An effective way to foster cooperation is to monitor behavior and sanction freeriding. Yet, previous studies have shown that cooperation quickly declines when sanctioning mechanisms are removed. We test whether explicitly expressing trust in players' capability to maintain cooperation after the removal of sanctions, i.e., vertical communication of trust, has the potential to alleviate this drop in compliance. Four incentivized public-goods experiments (<i>N</i> = 2,823) find that the vertical communication of trust maintains cooperation upon the removal of centralized (Study 1), third-party (Study 2a, 2b), and peer punishment (Study 3), and this effect extends beyond single interactions (Study 4). In all studies, vertical trust communication increases mutual trust among players, providing support to the idea that vertically communicating trust can be a self-fulfilling prophecy. Extrapolating our findings to natural environments, they suggest that authorities should carefully consider how they communicate the lifting of rules and sanctions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2415010122
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Maintaining cooperation through vertical communication of trust when removing sanctions

Joris Lammers, Sebastian Kube, Ann‐Christin Posten, Pınar Uğurlar
1 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
2.37
article

Maintaining cooperation through vertical communication of trust when removing sanctions

Joris Lammers, Sebastian Kube, Ann‐Christin Posten, Pınar Uğurlar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

An effective way to foster cooperation is to monitor behavior and sanction freeriding. Yet, previous studies have shown that cooperation quickly declines when sanctioning mechanisms are removed. We test whether explicitly expressing trust in players' capability to maintain cooperation after the removal of sanctions, i.e., vertical communication of trust, has the potential to alleviate this drop in compliance. Four incentivized public-goods experiments (<i>N</i> = 2,823) find that the vertical communication of trust maintains cooperation upon the removal of centralized (Study 1), third-party (Study 2a, 2b), and peer punishment (Study 3), and this effect extends beyond single interactions (Study 4). In all studies, vertical trust communication increases mutual trust among players, providing support to the idea that vertically communicating trust can be a self-fulfilling prophecy. Extrapolating our findings to natural environments, they suggest that authorities should carefully consider how they communicate the lifting of rules and sanctions.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 122(12)
University of Bonn (DE), University of Cologne (DE), University of Limerick (IE), Max Planck Institute for Behavioral Economics (DE), Özyeğin University (TR)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Maintaining cooperation through vertical communication of trust when removing sanctions — Joris Lammers, Sebastian Kube, et al. · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS