Socio-Technical Imaginaries and Techno-Social Territories: Connecting Sustainability and Open Innovation in Agroecology

Objective: This study aims to investigate how the concepts of socio-technical imaginaries and techno-social territories can support the creation of collaborative networks and technological inclusion, focusing on sustainability and agroecology. We seek to understand how these dynamics influence the acceptance of digital technologies and shape interactions among social actors in rural communities. Theoretical Framework: Tsocio-technical imaginaries (Jasatechno-social territories, an adaptation of the hydrosocial territories concept (Boelens et al., 2016). Additionally, the perspectives of open innovation (Chesbrough, 2003) and digital inclusion are considered to support the analysis of technology's impact on agroecological practices. Method: The methodology employed in this study follows a qualitative interpretative approach, using semi-structured interviews and participatory meetings conducted with family farmers from a rural community in Irati, Paraná, Brazil. Data collection aimed to identify perceptions, challenges, and opportunities in adopting digital technologies within the agroecological context. Results and Discussion: The findings indicate that positive socio-technical imaginaries play a crucial role in the acceptance of digital technologies, while techno-social territories facilitate structured interactions and information flows for forming collaborative networks. Participants highlighted challenges such as digital exclusion, limited connectivity, and the need for technical training. As a proposal, the implementation of the PinhalCoLab Platform is suggested a digital environment for agroecological product commercialization, training, and environmental monitoring. Although the platform has not yet been implemented, its feasibility was positively evaluated. Research Implications: The study contributes to the debate on digital inclusion and open innovation in family farming, providing insights for public policies focused on rural digitalization. Furthermore, the results can be applied to sustainable development projects, particularly in promoting technology-mediated agroecological practices. Originality/Value: This study advances the literature by proposing the application of socio-technical imaginaries and techno-social territories in the context of digital agriculture, an underexplored field. The research highlights how the combination of open innovation and digital technologies can strengthen agroecological networks and foster more sustainable practices in rural areas.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v19n3-038
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Socio-Technical Imaginaries and Techno-Social Territories: Connecting Sustainability and Open Innovation in Agroecology

Telma Regina Stroparo
3 citations
Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
7.34
article

Socio-Technical Imaginaries and Techno-Social Territories: Connecting Sustainability and Open Innovation in Agroecology

Telma Regina Stroparo
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to investigate how the concepts of socio-technical imaginaries and techno-social territories can support the creation of collaborative networks and technological inclusion, focusing on sustainability and agroecology. We seek to understand how these dynamics influence the acceptance of digital technologies and shape interactions among social actors in rural communities. Theoretical Framework: Tsocio-technical imaginaries (Jasatechno-social territories, an adaptation of the hydrosocial territories concept (Boelens et al., 2016). Additionally, the perspectives of open innovation (Chesbrough, 2003) and digital inclusion are considered to support the analysis of technology's impact on agroecological practices. Method: The methodology employed in this study follows a qualitative interpretative approach, using semi-structured interviews and participatory meetings conducted with family farmers from a rural community in Irati, Paraná, Brazil. Data collection aimed to identify perceptions, challenges, and opportunities in adopting digital technologies within the agroecological context. Results and Discussion: The findings indicate that positive socio-technical imaginaries play a crucial role in the acceptance of digital technologies, while techno-social territories facilitate structured interactions and information flows for forming collaborative networks. Participants highlighted challenges such as digital exclusion, limited connectivity, and the need for technical training. As a proposal, the implementation of the PinhalCoLab Platform is suggested a digital environment for agroecological product commercialization, training, and environmental monitoring. Although the platform has not yet been implemented, its feasibility was positively evaluated. Research Implications: The study contributes to the debate on digital inclusion and open innovation in family farming, providing insights for public policies focused on rural digitalization. Furthermore, the results can be applied to sustainable development projects, particularly in promoting technology-mediated agroecological practices. Originality/Value: This study advances the literature by proposing the application of socio-technical imaginaries and techno-social territories in the context of digital agriculture, an underexplored field. The research highlights how the combination of open innovation and digital technologies can strengthen agroecological networks and foster more sustainable practices in rural areas.

Revista de Gestão Social e AmbientalVol. 19(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
7.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.