How Do Intersections of Sexual Orientation and Race Affect Impressions of Women in a Counter-stereotypical Job Context? A Comprehensive Test Manipulating Individuating Competence Information

Research has oftentimes demonstrated a perceived lack-of-fit between impressions of female applicants and male-typed jobs requiring competent, assertive behavior. Most of this research has neglected an intersectional perspective, accounting for unique experiences of dis/advantages connected to multiple group membership. If identity intersections were taken into account, findings on if, and how, female applicants’ identity intersections affect perceptions of competence, warmth, and hireability have been contradictory. Previous research has typically relied on smallish stimulus samples and not used state-of-the-art statistical analyses. Moreover, given the central role of competence for career success, individuating information on applicants’ competence versus warmth could be a crucial moderator variable. Also addressing a lack of research on discrimination experienced by Black people in Germany, we used a 2 (lesbian vs. heterosexual) x 2 (Black vs. White) x 4 (level of competence vs. warmth) within-subject design. A general-population sample of people working at least part-time (N = 212) rated 32 fictitious female applicants for a male-typed leadership position on competence, warmth, conservativeness, and apparent hireability. Multilevel analysis revealed that assessed warmth, but not competence changed with self-presented competence (expressed through individuating information), while both generally appeared high. Intersecting group memberships played only a minor role for impressions (with one exception regarding White lesbians’ inferred conservativeness). Results of classic ANOVAs as used in most previous research produced diverse main and interaction effects also for competence and warmth. We discuss methodological considerations and the roles of identity intersections and individuating information for patterns of continuing discrimination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Collabra Psychology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.129119
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Do Intersections of Sexual Orientation and Race Affect Impressions of Women in a Counter-stereotypical Job Context? A Comprehensive Test Manipulating Individuating Competence Information

Melanie C. Steffens, Elena Ball, Elisabeth Prestele, Peter Pylypiw
1 citations
Collabra Psychology
Gender Diversity and Inequality
3.87
article

How Do Intersections of Sexual Orientation and Race Affect Impressions of Women in a Counter-stereotypical Job Context? A Comprehensive Test Manipulating Individuating Competence Information

Melanie C. Steffens, Elena Ball, Elisabeth Prestele, Peter Pylypiw
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Research has oftentimes demonstrated a perceived lack-of-fit between impressions of female applicants and male-typed jobs requiring competent, assertive behavior. Most of this research has neglected an intersectional perspective, accounting for unique experiences of dis/advantages connected to multiple group membership. If identity intersections were taken into account, findings on if, and how, female applicants’ identity intersections affect perceptions of competence, warmth, and hireability have been contradictory. Previous research has typically relied on smallish stimulus samples and not used state-of-the-art statistical analyses. Moreover, given the central role of competence for career success, individuating information on applicants’ competence versus warmth could be a crucial moderator variable. Also addressing a lack of research on discrimination experienced by Black people in Germany, we used a 2 (lesbian vs. heterosexual) x 2 (Black vs. White) x 4 (level of competence vs. warmth) within-subject design. A general-population sample of people working at least part-time (N = 212) rated 32 fictitious female applicants for a male-typed leadership position on competence, warmth, conservativeness, and apparent hireability. Multilevel analysis revealed that assessed warmth, but not competence changed with self-presented competence (expressed through individuating information), while both generally appeared high. Intersecting group memberships played only a minor role for impressions (with one exception regarding White lesbians’ inferred conservativeness). Results of classic ANOVAs as used in most previous research produced diverse main and interaction effects also for competence and warmth. We discuss methodological considerations and the roles of identity intersections and individuating information for patterns of continuing discrimination.

Collabra PsychologyVol. 11(1)
University of Kaiserslautern (DE), University of Koblenz and Landau (DE), Rheinland-Pfälzische Technische Universität Kaiserslautern-Landau (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
3.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.