User Actions within a Clinical Decision Support Alert for the Management of Hypertension in Chronic Kidney Disease

This study aimed to examine user actions within a clinical decision support (CDS) alert addressing hypertension (HTN) in chronic kidney disease (CKD).A pragmatic randomized controlled trial of a CDS alert for primary care patients with CKD and uncontrolled blood pressure included prechecked default orders for medication initiation or titration, basic metabolic panel (BMP), and nephrology electronic consult (e-consult). We examined each type of action and calculated percentages of placed and signed orders for subgroups of firings.There were firings for medication initiation (813) and medication titration (430), and every firing also included orders for nephrology e-consult (1,243) and BMP (1,243). High rates of override (59.6%) and deferral (14.6%) were observed, and CDS-recommended orders were only signed about one-third of the time from within the alert. The percentage of orders that were signed after being placed within the alert was higher for medication initiation than for medication titration (33 vs. 12.0% for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors [ACEi] and 38.8 vs. 14% for angiotensin II receptor blockers [ARBs]). Findings suggest that users are hesitant to commit to immediate action within the alert.Evaluating user interaction within alerts reveals nuances in physician preferences and workflow that should inform CDS alert design. This study is registered with the Clinicaltrials.gov Trial Registration (identifier: NCT03679247).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Clinical Informatics
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2554-3969
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Electronic Health Records Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

User Actions within a Clinical Decision Support Alert for the Management of Hypertension in Chronic Kidney Disease

Adam T. Wright, Heather J. Baer, S. Chen, Michael Sainlaire et al.
2 citations
Applied Clinical Informatics
Electronic Health Records Systems
5.88
article

User Actions within a Clinical Decision Support Alert for the Management of Hypertension in Chronic Kidney Disease

Adam T. Wright, Heather J. Baer, S. Chen, Michael Sainlaire, John L. Kilgallon, Michael P. Gannon, David Westfall Bates, Richard Fay, Hojjat Salmasian, Patricia C. Dykes, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Allison B. McCoy, Lipika Samal, Pamela M. Garabedian, Weng Ian Chay, Edward Wu, Chenxi Gao, Matthew F. Wien, R. Dunk
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to examine user actions within a clinical decision support (CDS) alert addressing hypertension (HTN) in chronic kidney disease (CKD).A pragmatic randomized controlled trial of a CDS alert for primary care patients with CKD and uncontrolled blood pressure included prechecked default orders for medication initiation or titration, basic metabolic panel (BMP), and nephrology electronic consult (e-consult). We examined each type of action and calculated percentages of placed and signed orders for subgroups of firings.There were firings for medication initiation (813) and medication titration (430), and every firing also included orders for nephrology e-consult (1,243) and BMP (1,243). High rates of override (59.6%) and deferral (14.6%) were observed, and CDS-recommended orders were only signed about one-third of the time from within the alert. The percentage of orders that were signed after being placed within the alert was higher for medication initiation than for medication titration (33 vs. 12.0% for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors [ACEi] and 38.8 vs. 14% for angiotensin II receptor blockers [ARBs]). Findings suggest that users are hesitant to commit to immediate action within the alert.Evaluating user interaction within alerts reveals nuances in physician preferences and workflow that should inform CDS alert design. This study is registered with the Clinicaltrials.gov Trial Registration (identifier: NCT03679247).

Applied Clinical InformaticsVol. 16(03)
Boston University (US), Political Research Associates (US), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US), Harvard University (US), Eastern Virginia Medical School (US), Vanderbilt University (US), Alabama College of Osteopathic Medicine (US), Cancer Research And Biostatistics (US), Center for Discovery (US), Mass General Brigham (US)
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Electronic Health Records Systems
5.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.