Phylogenomic and morphological evidence supports the reinstatement of the bamboo genus Clavinodum from Oligostachyum (Poaceae: Bambusoideae)

One of the most intractable problems in bamboo systematics concerns the three-branched bamboos of tribe Arundinarieae (Poaceae: Bambusoideae), which are collectively characterized by having three branches per mid-culm node. Previous phylogenetic studies based on double-digest restriction-site associated DNA sequencing (ddRAD-seq) data confirmed that Oligostachyum, a member of this group, is non-monophyletic, and in particular that Oligostachyum oedogonatum is a problematic species deserving further attention, as it appears to be morphologically and phylogenetically distinct from the other three-branched bamboos. Here we aim to define and confirm the phylogenetic position of O. oedogonatum, by including representatives from across its geographic range. We also provide new insights into the overall phylogeny of the three-branched bamboos and closely related genera, using multiple phylogenomic datasets. While a plastid genome-based tree is very poorly supported, phylogenies inferred using two sets of conserved nuclear genes and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data yield generally well-supported and congruent topologies using coalescent-based approaches. The tree inferred from the largest concatenated gene set is the most dissimilar to other inferences. The nuclear-based data sets all recover a major clade that includes all of the three-branched bamboos and four other genera, which can be distinguished from related taxa due to their possession of three stigmas per floret and leptomorph rhizomes. Notably, eight O. oedogonatum samples form a clade that is distantly related to other members of Oligostachyum, including the type species of the genus (Oligostachyum sulcatum). Population genetic approaches and multi-species coalescent-based analysis of the nuclear data sets imply that seven of these populations can be treated as a single species, O. oedogonatum, but that one population from Jinggangshan is likely an intergeneric hybrid between O. oedogonatum and Pleioblastus. Morphologically, O. oedogonatum differs from all other three-branched bamboos, in having strongly asymmetrically swollen supra-nodal ridges, a laterally compressed spikelet, and rachilla segments that disarticulate readily below fertile florets. Because of its morphological distinctiveness and molecular phylogenetic position, we propose that this taxon should be reinstated as Clavinodum oedogonatum. We provide a new description for this monotypic genus here.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2025.108327
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phylogenomic and morphological evidence supports the reinstatement of the bamboo genus Clavinodum from Oligostachyum (Poaceae: Bambusoideae)

Si‐Jin Zeng, Yi-hua Tong, Nian‐He Xia, Sean W. Graham et al.
2 citations
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics
6.05
article

Phylogenomic and morphological evidence supports the reinstatement of the bamboo genus Clavinodum from Oligostachyum (Poaceae: Bambusoideae)

Si‐Jin Zeng, Yi-hua Tong, Nian‐He Xia, Sean W. Graham, Zhengyang Niu, Zhixian Zhang, Zhuoyu Cai
article en
2 citations

Abstract

One of the most intractable problems in bamboo systematics concerns the three-branched bamboos of tribe Arundinarieae (Poaceae: Bambusoideae), which are collectively characterized by having three branches per mid-culm node. Previous phylogenetic studies based on double-digest restriction-site associated DNA sequencing (ddRAD-seq) data confirmed that Oligostachyum, a member of this group, is non-monophyletic, and in particular that Oligostachyum oedogonatum is a problematic species deserving further attention, as it appears to be morphologically and phylogenetically distinct from the other three-branched bamboos. Here we aim to define and confirm the phylogenetic position of O. oedogonatum, by including representatives from across its geographic range. We also provide new insights into the overall phylogeny of the three-branched bamboos and closely related genera, using multiple phylogenomic datasets. While a plastid genome-based tree is very poorly supported, phylogenies inferred using two sets of conserved nuclear genes and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data yield generally well-supported and congruent topologies using coalescent-based approaches. The tree inferred from the largest concatenated gene set is the most dissimilar to other inferences. The nuclear-based data sets all recover a major clade that includes all of the three-branched bamboos and four other genera, which can be distinguished from related taxa due to their possession of three stigmas per floret and leptomorph rhizomes. Notably, eight O. oedogonatum samples form a clade that is distantly related to other members of Oligostachyum, including the type species of the genus (Oligostachyum sulcatum). Population genetic approaches and multi-species coalescent-based analysis of the nuclear data sets imply that seven of these populations can be treated as a single species, O. oedogonatum, but that one population from Jinggangshan is likely an intergeneric hybrid between O. oedogonatum and Pleioblastus. Morphologically, O. oedogonatum differs from all other three-branched bamboos, in having strongly asymmetrically swollen supra-nodal ridges, a laterally compressed spikelet, and rachilla segments that disarticulate readily below fertile florets. Because of its morphological distinctiveness and molecular phylogenetic position, we propose that this taxon should be reinstated as Clavinodum oedogonatum. We provide a new description for this monotypic genus here.

Molecular Phylogenetics and EvolutionVol. 207
University of British Columbia (CA), Nanjing Forestry University (CN), Beijing Botanical Garden (CN), South China Botanical Garden (CN)
Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics
6.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.