Factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy and potential solutions to increase vaccination rates and public confidence in vaccination: A Cross-Sectional Study from Madhepura District of Bihar

Background: Vaccine hesitancy is characterised as the delay in the adoption or outright rejection of vaccines notwithstanding their accessibility constitutes a substantial risk to public health. Comprehending the fundamental reasons for vaccine hesitancy and its repercussions is essential for formulating successful methods to enhance rates of vaccination and public confidence in vaccinations. Aim: This investigation seeks to examine the factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy and its repercussions, as well as to assess options for improving vaccination rates and public confidence in vaccinations within a designated community. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional investigation was performed. 150 participants in all were selected at random and assessed using validated questionnaires and structured interviews. In order to look at correlations and find predictors of vaccine reluctance, data were analysed using SPSS version 23.0, which used logistic regression, chi-square tests, and descriptive statistics. Results: The research indicated that 35% of individuals demonstrated vaccine reluctance, with notable correlations identified with age, educational attainment, and employment position. Advanced education correlated with reduced vaccine reluctance (OR = 0.449, p = 0.0449), whereas unemployment heightened the probability of hesitancy (OR = 1.649, p = 0.0449). Confidence in medical practitioners was elevated, whereas reliance on social media for vaccine information was minimal. Individuals concerned about vaccines were markedly more prone to missing planned shots (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Vaccine reluctance is affected by socioeconomic and educational characteristics, carrying substantial public health consequences. Initiatives to mitigate reluctance should concentrate on educational strategies and the resolution of socioeconomic obstacles. Strengthening trust in medical practitioners and addressing false information on social media are critical tactics to elevate immunisation rates. Recommendations: Public health measures must emphasise focused educational initiatives, provide access to credible vaccine information, and tackle socioeconomic inequalities. It is advisable for and community leaders to collaborate in order to establish public trust and combat vaccine disinformation. Keywords: Vaccination Rate, Vaccine Hesitancy, Socioeconomic Factors, Public Health

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Medical and Biomedical Studies
Published
2025-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32553/ijmbs.v9i1.3003
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy and potential solutions to increase vaccination rates and public confidence in vaccination: A Cross-Sectional Study from Madhepura District of Bihar

Abhay Kumar, Kashif Shahnawaz, Laxman Kumar
International Journal of Medical and Biomedical Studies
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

Factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy and potential solutions to increase vaccination rates and public confidence in vaccination: A Cross-Sectional Study from Madhepura District of Bihar

Abhay Kumar, Kashif Shahnawaz, Laxman Kumar
article en

Abstract

Background: Vaccine hesitancy is characterised as the delay in the adoption or outright rejection of vaccines notwithstanding their accessibility constitutes a substantial risk to public health. Comprehending the fundamental reasons for vaccine hesitancy and its repercussions is essential for formulating successful methods to enhance rates of vaccination and public confidence in vaccinations. Aim: This investigation seeks to examine the factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy and its repercussions, as well as to assess options for improving vaccination rates and public confidence in vaccinations within a designated community. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional investigation was performed. 150 participants in all were selected at random and assessed using validated questionnaires and structured interviews. In order to look at correlations and find predictors of vaccine reluctance, data were analysed using SPSS version 23.0, which used logistic regression, chi-square tests, and descriptive statistics. Results: The research indicated that 35% of individuals demonstrated vaccine reluctance, with notable correlations identified with age, educational attainment, and employment position. Advanced education correlated with reduced vaccine reluctance (OR = 0.449, p = 0.0449), whereas unemployment heightened the probability of hesitancy (OR = 1.649, p = 0.0449). Confidence in medical practitioners was elevated, whereas reliance on social media for vaccine information was minimal. Individuals concerned about vaccines were markedly more prone to missing planned shots (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Vaccine reluctance is affected by socioeconomic and educational characteristics, carrying substantial public health consequences. Initiatives to mitigate reluctance should concentrate on educational strategies and the resolution of socioeconomic obstacles. Strengthening trust in medical practitioners and addressing false information on social media are critical tactics to elevate immunisation rates. Recommendations: Public health measures must emphasise focused educational initiatives, provide access to credible vaccine information, and tackle socioeconomic inequalities. It is advisable for and community leaders to collaborate in order to establish public trust and combat vaccine disinformation. Keywords: Vaccination Rate, Vaccine Hesitancy, Socioeconomic Factors, Public Health

International Journal of Medical and Biomedical StudiesVol. 9(1)
Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar Bihar University (IN), Dinajpur Medical College (BD), Government Medical College (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.