Dynamic Interference Testing Results with the Dexcom G6 Continuous Glucose Monitoring Device

Background: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is becoming a standard diagnostic procedure in people with diabetes. However, little is known about how glucose oxidase-based interstitial sensors react to potentially interfering substances. We report on in vitro dynamic interference testing with Dexcom G6 sensors. Methods: Using pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) pump-controlled substance gradients, we exposed sensors to varying concentrations of 69 substances in triplicate using YSI Stat 2300 Plus as glucose reference. Results: Interference was assumed if the device showed more than ±10% bias over baseline, and it was seen for Dexcom G6 with the following substances: acetaminophen, dithiothreitol, ethyl alcohol, galactose, gentisic acid, hydroxyurea, l -cysteine, l -dopa, mannose, N -acetyl-cysteine, and uric acid. Additionally, sensors could not subsequently be calibrated for use after exposure to dithiothreitol, gentisic acid, l -cysteine, and mesalazine (sensor fouling). Interference testing identified several nutritional, pharmacological, and endogenous substances that biased the Dexcom G6 signal in vitro. Conclusions: The in vitro test protocol cannot replace appropriate clinical testing, but if confirmed clinically, such interferences should be considered when making treatment decisions using Dexcom G6 readings. More research on the interference behavior of CGM sensors is strongly recommended before using them broadly in automated insulin delivery systems with insulin pumps.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetes Technology and Obesity Medicine
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/dtom.2024.0009
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic Interference Testing Results with the Dexcom G6 Continuous Glucose Monitoring Device

Hendrick Jensch, Mike Grady, Andreas Pfützner, Nicole Thomé et al.
1 citations
Diabetes Technology and Obesity Medicine
Diabetes Management and Research
1.29
article

Dynamic Interference Testing Results with the Dexcom G6 Continuous Glucose Monitoring Device

Hendrick Jensch, Mike Grady, Andreas Pfützner, Nicole Thomé, Elizabeth M. Holt, Steven Setford, Geethan Srikanthamoorthy, Lea Weingärtner
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is becoming a standard diagnostic procedure in people with diabetes. However, little is known about how glucose oxidase-based interstitial sensors react to potentially interfering substances. We report on in vitro dynamic interference testing with Dexcom G6 sensors. Methods: Using pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) pump-controlled substance gradients, we exposed sensors to varying concentrations of 69 substances in triplicate using YSI Stat 2300 Plus as glucose reference. Results: Interference was assumed if the device showed more than ±10% bias over baseline, and it was seen for Dexcom G6 with the following substances: acetaminophen, dithiothreitol, ethyl alcohol, galactose, gentisic acid, hydroxyurea, l -cysteine, l -dopa, mannose, N -acetyl-cysteine, and uric acid. Additionally, sensors could not subsequently be calibrated for use after exposure to dithiothreitol, gentisic acid, l -cysteine, and mesalazine (sensor fouling). Interference testing identified several nutritional, pharmacological, and endogenous substances that biased the Dexcom G6 signal in vitro. Conclusions: The in vitro test protocol cannot replace appropriate clinical testing, but if confirmed clinically, such interferences should be considered when making treatment decisions using Dexcom G6 readings. More research on the interference behavior of CGM sensors is strongly recommended before using them broadly in automated insulin delivery systems with insulin pumps.

Diabetes Technology and Obesity MedicineVol. 1(1)
TH Bingen University of Applied Sciences (DE), University of Luxembourg (LU), Reaction Biology Corporation (United States) (US), MemorialCare Health System (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Diabetes Management and Research
1.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.