The Subjective/Objective Distinction in Well-Being

How should we understand the fundamental difference between objective and subjective theories of well-being? Authors typically presuppose some understanding of the divide but don’t do much to explain why that understanding is better than its rivals or gets at the heart of the distinction. We explicate criteria for a better account of the divide and use such criteria to critique extant understandings of the divide. We then propose and defend a new understanding of the divide, one that characterizes subjectivism in terms of the normative role it grants to warrantless attitudes in grounding benefits to subjects.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Ethics
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/733905
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
34.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Subjective/Objective Distinction in Well-Being

Steven Wall, David Sobel
2 citations
Ethics
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
34.53
article

The Subjective/Objective Distinction in Well-Being

Steven Wall, David Sobel
article en
2 citations

Abstract

How should we understand the fundamental difference between objective and subjective theories of well-being? Authors typically presuppose some understanding of the divide but don’t do much to explain why that understanding is better than its rivals or gets at the heart of the distinction. We explicate criteria for a better account of the divide and use such criteria to critique extant understandings of the divide. We then propose and defend a new understanding of the divide, one that characterizes subjectivism in terms of the normative role it grants to warrantless attitudes in grounding benefits to subjects.

EthicsVol. 135(3)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
34.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.