Crafting an Intersectional Response to Bill C-27 for the Standing Committee on Industry and Technology

Background: In the fall of 2023, a group of scholars prepared a brief to respond intersectionally to Bill C-27 after its second reading and study by the Standing Committee on Industry and Technology. Updates to Canada’s private sector privacy law and regulation of artificial intelligence were important elements proposed in Bill C-27. Analysis: This article reflects upon five significant issues related to our brief and intersectionality. Conclusion and implications: Our reflections contribute to a greater understanding of the critical/administrative dichotomy in communications scholarship, and to knowledge about how to apply an intersectional approach to privacy and AI policy in Canada.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Communication
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3138/cjc-2024-0019
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Intellectual Property Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crafting an Intersectional Response to Bill C-27 for the Standing Committee on Industry and Technology

Sara Bannerman, Jonathan A. Obar, Opeyemi Akanbi, Joanna Redden et al.
1 citations
Canadian Journal of Communication
Intellectual Property Law
15.98
article

Crafting an Intersectional Response to Bill C-27 for the Standing Committee on Industry and Technology

Sara Bannerman, Jonathan A. Obar, Opeyemi Akanbi, Joanna Redden, Sana Maqsood, Karen L. Smith
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: In the fall of 2023, a group of scholars prepared a brief to respond intersectionally to Bill C-27 after its second reading and study by the Standing Committee on Industry and Technology. Updates to Canada’s private sector privacy law and regulation of artificial intelligence were important elements proposed in Bill C-27. Analysis: This article reflects upon five significant issues related to our brief and intersectionality. Conclusion and implications: Our reflections contribute to a greater understanding of the critical/administrative dichotomy in communications scholarship, and to knowledge about how to apply an intersectional approach to privacy and AI policy in Canada.

Canadian Journal of CommunicationVol. 50(1)
Western University (CA), Brock University (CA), York University (CA), Toronto Metropolitan University (CA), McMaster University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Intellectual Property Law
15.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Crafting an Intersectional Response to Bill C-27 for the Standing Committee on Industry and Technology — Sara Bannerman, Jonathan A. Obar, et al. · Canadian Journal of Communication (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS