Dynamic Deformation Mechanisms and Mechanical Properties of Additively Manufactured Closed‐Cell Foams of Various Topologies

Closed‐cell foams are widely used in energy absorption and load‐bearing applications. Herein, four lightweight closed‐cell foam topologies—tetrakaidecahedron, octet, spherical, and reverse hexagonal—are designed, manufactured, and mechanically tested. The structures are fabricated from acrylonitrile butadiene styrene using fused deposition modeling and subjected to low‐velocity impact to investigate their elastic, plastic, and energy absorption behavior under dynamic loading. Deformation mechanisms are investigated to explore the role of topological architectures on mechanical response. Among the structures, the reverse hexagonal topology exhibits the highest yield strength and elastic stiffness, making it suitable for load‐bearing applications. However, it demonstrates poor energy absorption due to its inability to utilize joints as plastic hinges during impact. In contrast, the octet structure exhibits superior energy absorption through a layer‐by‐layer collapse mechanism but offers limited elastic properties. The formation of shear bands in tetrakaidecahedron structure leads to midrange elastic properties. The spherical structure, however, shows poor energy absorption due to its unsystematic deformation and cell‐wall distortion. The tetrakaidecahedron foam shows increased strength but reduced energy absorption during impact compared to quasi‐static compression. These findings highlight the importance of considering dynamic mechanical properties when designing structures for impact‐prone applications throughout their service life.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Engineering Materials
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202401892
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Cellular and Composite Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.14
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic Deformation Mechanisms and Mechanical Properties of Additively Manufactured Closed‐Cell Foams of Various Topologies

Juan Pablo Escobedo, Md. Ashraful Islam, Mohammad Saadatfar, Paul J. Hazell et al.
3 citations
Advanced Engineering Materials
Cellular and Composite Structures
2.14
article

Dynamic Deformation Mechanisms and Mechanical Properties of Additively Manufactured Closed‐Cell Foams of Various Topologies

Juan Pablo Escobedo, Md. Ashraful Islam, Mohammad Saadatfar, Paul J. Hazell, M.A. Kader, Md Abdul Wares
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Closed‐cell foams are widely used in energy absorption and load‐bearing applications. Herein, four lightweight closed‐cell foam topologies—tetrakaidecahedron, octet, spherical, and reverse hexagonal—are designed, manufactured, and mechanically tested. The structures are fabricated from acrylonitrile butadiene styrene using fused deposition modeling and subjected to low‐velocity impact to investigate their elastic, plastic, and energy absorption behavior under dynamic loading. Deformation mechanisms are investigated to explore the role of topological architectures on mechanical response. Among the structures, the reverse hexagonal topology exhibits the highest yield strength and elastic stiffness, making it suitable for load‐bearing applications. However, it demonstrates poor energy absorption due to its inability to utilize joints as plastic hinges during impact. In contrast, the octet structure exhibits superior energy absorption through a layer‐by‐layer collapse mechanism but offers limited elastic properties. The formation of shear bands in tetrakaidecahedron structure leads to midrange elastic properties. The spherical structure, however, shows poor energy absorption due to its unsystematic deformation and cell‐wall distortion. The tetrakaidecahedron foam shows increased strength but reduced energy absorption during impact compared to quasi‐static compression. These findings highlight the importance of considering dynamic mechanical properties when designing structures for impact‐prone applications throughout their service life.

Advanced Engineering MaterialsVol. 27(9)
The University of Sydney (AU), Khulna University of Engineering and Technology (BD), Rajshahi University of Engineering and Technology (BD), University of Canberra (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), UNSW Canberra
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Cellular and Composite Structures
2.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.