Advancements and Performance Analysis of Feature Detection and Matching Methods in Visual Odometry

This study presents a comprehensive performance analysis of feature detectors and descriptors in visual odometry (VO) based on four key metrics: absolute trajectory error (ATE), relative pose error (RPE), cumulative drift, and frames per second (FPS). Five algorithm-based methods (SIFT, ROOTSIFT, ORB, KAZE, and AKAZE) and five AI-based methods (SuperPoint, DISK, ALIKED, D2NET, and Xfeat) are evaluated using two matching strategies: Brute-Force and LIGHTGLUE. Performance assessment is conducted on the KITTI dataset, demonstrating that KAZE achieves the best results in ATE and cumulative drift, while ALIKED outperforms in RPE and FPS. These findings offer valuable insights for selecting the optimal feature detection and description techniques in real-world VO applications.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Institute of Control Robotics and Systems
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5302/j.icros.2025.25.8003
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Image and Object Detection Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancements and Performance Analysis of Feature Detection and Matching Methods in Visual Odometry

Chang Ho Kang, Jihun Choi, Sunyoung Kim
1 citations
Journal of Institute of Control Robotics and Systems
Image and Object Detection Techniques
1.28
article

Advancements and Performance Analysis of Feature Detection and Matching Methods in Visual Odometry

Chang Ho Kang, Jihun Choi, Sunyoung Kim
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive performance analysis of feature detectors and descriptors in visual odometry (VO) based on four key metrics: absolute trajectory error (ATE), relative pose error (RPE), cumulative drift, and frames per second (FPS). Five algorithm-based methods (SIFT, ROOTSIFT, ORB, KAZE, and AKAZE) and five AI-based methods (SuperPoint, DISK, ALIKED, D2NET, and Xfeat) are evaluated using two matching strategies: Brute-Force and LIGHTGLUE. Performance assessment is conducted on the KITTI dataset, demonstrating that KAZE achieves the best results in ATE and cumulative drift, while ALIKED outperforms in RPE and FPS. These findings offer valuable insights for selecting the optimal feature detection and description techniques in real-world VO applications.

Journal of Institute of Control Robotics and SystemsVol. 31(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Image and Object Detection Techniques
1.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Advancements and Performance Analysis of Feature Detection and Matching Methods in Visual Odometry — Chang Ho Kang, Jihun Choi, et al. · Journal of Institute of Control Robotics and Systems (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS