Machine learning meeting the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt scenario

In this work we perform a comprehensive study of the machine learning (ML) methods for the purpose of characterizing the quantum set of correlations. As our main focus is on assessing the usefulness and effectiveness of the ML approach, we focus exclusively on the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt scenario, both the four-dimensional variant, for which an analytical solution is known, and the eight-dimensional variant, for which no analytical solution is known but numerical approaches are relatively well understood. We consider a wide selection of approaches, ranging from simple data science models to dense neural networks. The two classes of models that perform well are support vector machines and dense neural networks, and they are the main focus of this work. We conclude that while it is relatively easy to achieve good performance on average, it is hard to train a model that performs well on the hard cases, i.e., points in the vicinity of the boundary of the quantum set, which are precisely the cases that are interesting from the academic point of view. In order to improve performance on hard cases we must, especially for the eight-dimensional problem, resort to a tailored choice of training data, which means that we are implicitly feeding our intuition and biases into the model. We feel that this is an important and often overlooked aspect of applying ML models to academic problems, where data generation or data selection is performed according to some implicit subjective criteria. In this way, it is possible to unconsciously steer our model so that it exhibits features that we are interested in seeing. Hence, special care must be taken while determining whether ML methods can be considered objective and unbiased in the context of academic problems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. A/Physical review, A
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.111.032419
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning meeting the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt scenario

Gabriel Pereira Alves, N. Gigena, Jędrzej Kaniewski
Physical review. A/Physical review, A
Machine Learning in Materials Science
article

Machine learning meeting the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt scenario

Gabriel Pereira Alves, N. Gigena, Jędrzej Kaniewski
article en

Abstract

In this work we perform a comprehensive study of the machine learning (ML) methods for the purpose of characterizing the quantum set of correlations. As our main focus is on assessing the usefulness and effectiveness of the ML approach, we focus exclusively on the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt scenario, both the four-dimensional variant, for which an analytical solution is known, and the eight-dimensional variant, for which no analytical solution is known but numerical approaches are relatively well understood. We consider a wide selection of approaches, ranging from simple data science models to dense neural networks. The two classes of models that perform well are support vector machines and dense neural networks, and they are the main focus of this work. We conclude that while it is relatively easy to achieve good performance on average, it is hard to train a model that performs well on the hard cases, i.e., points in the vicinity of the boundary of the quantum set, which are precisely the cases that are interesting from the academic point of view. In order to improve performance on hard cases we must, especially for the eight-dimensional problem, resort to a tailored choice of training data, which means that we are implicitly feeding our intuition and biases into the model. We feel that this is an important and often overlooked aspect of applying ML models to academic problems, where data generation or data selection is performed according to some implicit subjective criteria. In this way, it is possible to unconsciously steer our model so that it exhibits features that we are interested in seeing. Hence, special care must be taken while determining whether ML methods can be considered objective and unbiased in the context of academic problems.

Physical review. A/Physical review, AVol. 111(3)
University of Warsaw (PL), Universidad Nacional de La Plata (AR)
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Narodowe Centrum Nauki, Academic Computer Centre Cyfronet, AGH University of Science and Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.