Flexural Behavior of Geopolymer RC Concrete Beams Containing Pet Waste as Sand Replacement

Abstract This study examines the flexural conduct of geopolymer concrete (GPC) beams, including polyethylene terephthalate (PET), used instead of sand with a water cementitious ratio of 0.125. Six size ratios of PET wastes were used 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 30%. Six reinforced GPC beams (one sample per PET percentage) were tested to study the effects of PET on the GPC beams’ structural behavior. All beams are simply supported with measurements (0.15*0.2*1.4) m. Appropriate experiments were carried out to assess the strength properties of GPC mixtures with PET and were compared to the mix without PET wastes as a reference where compressive fracture energy is used to evaluate the GPC mixtures’ strength. The investigations of reinforced geopolymer concrete beams were detection ultimate load, ductility, energy absorption, cracking pattern, and stiffness. The outcome of the examination of reinforced geopolymer concrete beams with PET replacement (5%_30%) demonstrated an approximately 6.62%_7.76% increase in the ultimate failure load and a 6.63%_29.33% increase in initial stiffness. All beams demonstrated an increase in ductility of 20.22%_92.59%, with a 11.34%_44.07% reduction in secant stiffness, respectively, comparing with the reference beam.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Civil and Environmental Engineering
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2025-0015
Primary Topic
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flexural Behavior of Geopolymer RC Concrete Beams Containing Pet Waste as Sand Replacement

Abbas Dawood, Noor M. Shakir
1 links
Civil and Environmental Engineering
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
article

Flexural Behavior of Geopolymer RC Concrete Beams Containing Pet Waste as Sand Replacement

Abbas Dawood, Noor M. Shakir
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study examines the flexural conduct of geopolymer concrete (GPC) beams, including polyethylene terephthalate (PET), used instead of sand with a water cementitious ratio of 0.125. Six size ratios of PET wastes were used 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 30%. Six reinforced GPC beams (one sample per PET percentage) were tested to study the effects of PET on the GPC beams’ structural behavior. All beams are simply supported with measurements (0.15*0.2*1.4) m. Appropriate experiments were carried out to assess the strength properties of GPC mixtures with PET and were compared to the mix without PET wastes as a reference where compressive fracture energy is used to evaluate the GPC mixtures’ strength. The investigations of reinforced geopolymer concrete beams were detection ultimate load, ductility, energy absorption, cracking pattern, and stiffness. The outcome of the examination of reinforced geopolymer concrete beams with PET replacement (5%_30%) demonstrated an approximately 6.62%_7.76% increase in the ultimate failure load and a 6.63%_29.33% increase in initial stiffness. All beams demonstrated an increase in ductility of 20.22%_92.59%, with a 11.34%_44.07% reduction in secant stiffness, respectively, comparing with the reference beam.

Civil and Environmental EngineeringVol. 21(1)
University of Misan (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Flexural Behavior of Geopolymer RC Concrete Beams Containing Pet Waste as Sand Replacement — Abbas Dawood, Noor M. Shakir · Civil and Environmental Engineering (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS