Exploring University Staff’s Perceptions of Using Generative Artificial Intelligence at University

This study aimed to understand university staff’s perspectives and approaches regarding students’ use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in an academic setting. Currently, there is a lack of social media analyses exploring this area. For the present study, a qualitative content analysis was conducted on posts about ChatGPT shared via X (formerly Twitter). This enabled a sample of n = 194 perspectives to be captured. Three main themes were generated: (1) perceptions of GenAI’s impact on higher education and skepticism towards its management; (2) GenAI in assessment: prevention and detection approaches; and (3) future-focused approaches to GenAI-enhanced learning and assessment. Some university staff see GenAI as a threat to their profession and have stressed the need for university guidance. Staff discussed both the positive and negative impacts of GenAI on student learning. Some staff want to prevent the use of GenAI in assessments, whilst others embrace the tool. These findings can inform university guidance on the use of GenAI in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2025-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030367
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring University Staff’s Perceptions of Using Generative Artificial Intelligence at University

M. Whitbread, Rebecca J. Upsher, Charles A. Hayes, Sundaresan Prabhakar
3 citations
Education Sciences
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.96
article

Exploring University Staff’s Perceptions of Using Generative Artificial Intelligence at University

M. Whitbread, Rebecca J. Upsher, Charles A. Hayes, Sundaresan Prabhakar
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to understand university staff’s perspectives and approaches regarding students’ use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in an academic setting. Currently, there is a lack of social media analyses exploring this area. For the present study, a qualitative content analysis was conducted on posts about ChatGPT shared via X (formerly Twitter). This enabled a sample of n = 194 perspectives to be captured. Three main themes were generated: (1) perceptions of GenAI’s impact on higher education and skepticism towards its management; (2) GenAI in assessment: prevention and detection approaches; and (3) future-focused approaches to GenAI-enhanced learning and assessment. Some university staff see GenAI as a threat to their profession and have stressed the need for university guidance. Staff discussed both the positive and negative impacts of GenAI on student learning. Some staff want to prevent the use of GenAI in assessments, whilst others embrace the tool. These findings can inform university guidance on the use of GenAI in the future.

Education SciencesVol. 15(3)
University of Hertfordshire (GB), King's College London (GB), South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring University Staff’s Perceptions of Using Generative Artificial Intelligence at University — M. Whitbread, Rebecca J. Upsher, et al. · Education Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS