Elective surgery cancellations: do you catch these patients?

Abstract Background Patients are often advised to withhold their medications prior to surgery. If the surgery date changes, a plan regarding medicine use needs to be communicated to the patient. Bulk cancellations of elective surgery due to the COVID‐19 pandemic highlighted a gap in practice. Aim To report on intervention rate and time taken for pharmacist review of patient medications when bulk cancellations of elective surgery occurred. Method A screening tool was developed for nursing staff to identify patients on high‐risk medications. Medication plans were developed by the pharmacist, with input from the broader surgical team. Time spent was recorded by the pharmacist. Data were collected over a 3‐week period in July 2022. This project was exempt due to the local policy requirements that constitute research by the Metro South Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference no: CM0602202402). The justification for this exemption was as follows: the study complied with Chapter 2.3 of the National statement of ethical conduct in human research and presented no foreseeable risk of patient harm. Results The pharmacist reviewed 154 cancellations, of which 17% ( n = 26) required intervention by the pharmacist as they met the high‐risk criteria identified by the screening tool. Of these, 34% ( n = 9) had not attended pre‐admission clinic for an original medication plan. The time to conduct a pharmacist review ranged from 10–14 min. At the time of cancellation, 84% ( n = 130) of patients were awaiting a new surgery date. Surgical specialties most implicated included orthopaedic surgery (36%, n = 55) and urology (17%, n = 26). The average time between the cancellation date and a new surgery date was 7 days. Conclusion A pharmacist‐led process to review medication plans in patients whose elective surgery procedure date had been cancelled was developed. Communication of these plans is essential to ensure patient safety and reduce medication‐related harm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jppr.70002
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Elective surgery cancellations: do you catch these patients?

Kate Ziser, Tori Burfield
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

Elective surgery cancellations: do you catch these patients?

Kate Ziser, Tori Burfield
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Patients are often advised to withhold their medications prior to surgery. If the surgery date changes, a plan regarding medicine use needs to be communicated to the patient. Bulk cancellations of elective surgery due to the COVID‐19 pandemic highlighted a gap in practice. Aim To report on intervention rate and time taken for pharmacist review of patient medications when bulk cancellations of elective surgery occurred. Method A screening tool was developed for nursing staff to identify patients on high‐risk medications. Medication plans were developed by the pharmacist, with input from the broader surgical team. Time spent was recorded by the pharmacist. Data were collected over a 3‐week period in July 2022. This project was exempt due to the local policy requirements that constitute research by the Metro South Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference no: CM0602202402). The justification for this exemption was as follows: the study complied with Chapter 2.3 of the National statement of ethical conduct in human research and presented no foreseeable risk of patient harm. Results The pharmacist reviewed 154 cancellations, of which 17% ( n = 26) required intervention by the pharmacist as they met the high‐risk criteria identified by the screening tool. Of these, 34% ( n = 9) had not attended pre‐admission clinic for an original medication plan. The time to conduct a pharmacist review ranged from 10–14 min. At the time of cancellation, 84% ( n = 130) of patients were awaiting a new surgery date. Surgical specialties most implicated included orthopaedic surgery (36%, n = 55) and urology (17%, n = 26). The average time between the cancellation date and a new surgery date was 7 days. Conclusion A pharmacist‐led process to review medication plans in patients whose elective surgery procedure date had been cancelled was developed. Communication of these plans is essential to ensure patient safety and reduce medication‐related harm.

Journal of Pharmacy Practice and ResearchVol. 55(4)
Princess Alexandra Hospital (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Elective surgery cancellations: do you catch these patients? — Kate Ziser, Tori Burfield · Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS