READY? – Reflective dialog tool on issues relating to the use of robotic systems for nursing care

Abstract The assessment tool “READY?” supports care facilities and services in their institutional reflection on the use of robotics for nursing care. The tool contains a digitally supported question catalog completed in an accompanying workshop in the respective institution with the involvement of various stakeholders. The question catalog includes questions from the categories “Care”, “Privacy and legal issues”, “Ethical criteria”, “Technology and infrastructure”, “Institutional and social embeddedness”, and “Economic criteria” and thus pursues a multi-perspective approach. The assessment tool is empirically and theoretically based and was tested in four care facilities and services in the field. Four focus groups and a supplementary survey ( n = 32) were conducted during the testing. The results indicate that the assessment tool can assist in initiating an institutional debate on the prerequisites for the possible use of robotics. The focus group participants report that the tool offers an opportunity for professional discussion and the possibility to strengthen collaboration within the institution. Suggestions for improving the assessment tool were collected, including the prospective provision of literature-based recommendations and optimizing the introduction of the workshops.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
i-com
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2024-0043
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

READY? – Reflective dialog tool on issues relating to the use of robotic systems for nursing care

Jonathan Behrens, Christa Fricke, Sibylle Meyer, Heidrun Biedermann et al.
2 citations
i-com
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
4.88
article

READY? – Reflective dialog tool on issues relating to the use of robotic systems for nursing care

Jonathan Behrens, Christa Fricke, Sibylle Meyer, Heidrun Biedermann, Manfred Hülsken-Giesler, Celia Nieto Agraz, Andreas Hein, Marco Eichelberg, Richard Paluch, Dominic Seefeldt, Marcus Garthaus, Cláudia Müller, J Hoferichter, Simone Lienenbrink
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The assessment tool “READY?” supports care facilities and services in their institutional reflection on the use of robotics for nursing care. The tool contains a digitally supported question catalog completed in an accompanying workshop in the respective institution with the involvement of various stakeholders. The question catalog includes questions from the categories “Care”, “Privacy and legal issues”, “Ethical criteria”, “Technology and infrastructure”, “Institutional and social embeddedness”, and “Economic criteria” and thus pursues a multi-perspective approach. The assessment tool is empirically and theoretically based and was tested in four care facilities and services in the field. Four focus groups and a supplementary survey ( n = 32) were conducted during the testing. The results indicate that the assessment tool can assist in initiating an institutional debate on the prerequisites for the possible use of robotics. The focus group participants report that the tool offers an opportunity for professional discussion and the possibility to strengthen collaboration within the institution. Suggestions for improving the assessment tool were collected, including the prospective provision of literature-based recommendations and optimizing the introduction of the workshops.

i-comVol. 24(1)
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE), Osnabrück University (DE), University of Bremen (DE), Oldenburger Institut für Informatik (DE), University of Siegen (DE)
Universität Siegen, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
4.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.