Learning from mentors and their influence for the growth of startups: accelerators vs angels

Purpose This study investigates how angel and accelerator mentoring influence startup success. Design/methodology/approach A sample of European startups that received mentorship from accelerators or angel investors was selected. To mitigate selection bias and improve the comparability of treatment and control groups, coarsened exact matching was employed. Subsequently, t-tests were conducted to identify statistically significant differences in performance outcomes and to reliably test the resource based view between the two groups. Findings Angel-mentored startups outperformed accelerator-mentored startups across multiple metrics, including funding amount, funding stage, funding rounds, investor count, and employee growth. This suggests that the sustained, hands-on mentorship offered by angels is a critical driver of startup success. Research limitations/implications Due to the dynamic nature of the startup ecosystem, with new trends, technologies, and investment models the findings of this study should be interpreted in the context of the current landscape and may not be applicable in the future. Practical implications Angels offer extended, hands-on mentorship and guidance, in contrast to accelerators, which typically operate as short-term programs. This study highlights that the long-term engagement and direct involvement provided by angels significantly enhance startup performance. Based on these findings, accelerators may benefit from extending their association with startups to support more sustained growth. Social implications This research highlights the critical role of long-term mentorship in fostering startup growth and innovation. By understanding the impact of mentorship on startup performance, policymakers, educators, and investors can implement strategies to support entrepreneurs and drive innovation. These positive outcomes can contribute to economic growth, social equity, technological advancement and community development. Originality/value One of the limited number of empirical studies that have provided empirical evidence for the positive impact of long term mentoring on startup performance outcomes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Development in Learning Organizations An International Journal
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/dlo-12-2024-0351
Citations
1
Primary Topic
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning from mentors and their influence for the growth of startups: accelerators vs angels

Ranjany Sundaram, Snehal Shetty, Subramaniam Rajan
1 citations
Development in Learning Organizations An International Journal
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
2.28
article

Learning from mentors and their influence for the growth of startups: accelerators vs angels

Ranjany Sundaram, Snehal Shetty, Subramaniam Rajan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study investigates how angel and accelerator mentoring influence startup success. Design/methodology/approach A sample of European startups that received mentorship from accelerators or angel investors was selected. To mitigate selection bias and improve the comparability of treatment and control groups, coarsened exact matching was employed. Subsequently, t-tests were conducted to identify statistically significant differences in performance outcomes and to reliably test the resource based view between the two groups. Findings Angel-mentored startups outperformed accelerator-mentored startups across multiple metrics, including funding amount, funding stage, funding rounds, investor count, and employee growth. This suggests that the sustained, hands-on mentorship offered by angels is a critical driver of startup success. Research limitations/implications Due to the dynamic nature of the startup ecosystem, with new trends, technologies, and investment models the findings of this study should be interpreted in the context of the current landscape and may not be applicable in the future. Practical implications Angels offer extended, hands-on mentorship and guidance, in contrast to accelerators, which typically operate as short-term programs. This study highlights that the long-term engagement and direct involvement provided by angels significantly enhance startup performance. Based on these findings, accelerators may benefit from extending their association with startups to support more sustained growth. Social implications This research highlights the critical role of long-term mentorship in fostering startup growth and innovation. By understanding the impact of mentorship on startup performance, policymakers, educators, and investors can implement strategies to support entrepreneurs and drive innovation. These positive outcomes can contribute to economic growth, social equity, technological advancement and community development. Originality/value One of the limited number of empirical studies that have provided empirical evidence for the positive impact of long term mentoring on startup performance outcomes.

Development in Learning Organizations An International Journal
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
2.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.