Comparative survival outcome of synchronous and metachronous brain metastasis from colorectal cancer: A meta‑analysis

Synchronous and metachronous brain metastases (BM) are increasingly recognized in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to assess whether the timing of BM development affects survival outcomes by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. A comprehensive search of the Cochrane Library, Embase and MEDLINE databases was performed, covering studies from January 1900 to December 2023. To compare survival outcomes between synchronous and metachronous BM, hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) were extracted from the included studies and pooled using a random-effects model. The systematic review included nine retrospective cohort studies comprising 910 patients with BM from CRC. Meta-analysis results showed no significant difference in OS between patients with synchronous and metachronous BM (HR, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.59-1.38; P=0.63). In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that the timing of BM development does not impact OS in patients with BM from CRC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oncology Letters
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2025.14979
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Brain Metastases and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative survival outcome of synchronous and metachronous brain metastasis from colorectal cancer: A meta‑analysis

Tung‐Hu Tsai, Kuan‐Yu Chi, Yu‐Sun Chang, Junmin Song et al.
2 citations
Oncology Letters
Brain Metastases and Treatment
3.04
article

Comparative survival outcome of synchronous and metachronous brain metastasis from colorectal cancer: A meta‑analysis

Tung‐Hu Tsai, Kuan‐Yu Chi, Yu‐Sun Chang, Junmin Song, Hong-Min Lin
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Synchronous and metachronous brain metastases (BM) are increasingly recognized in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to assess whether the timing of BM development affects survival outcomes by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. A comprehensive search of the Cochrane Library, Embase and MEDLINE databases was performed, covering studies from January 1900 to December 2023. To compare survival outcomes between synchronous and metachronous BM, hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) were extracted from the included studies and pooled using a random-effects model. The systematic review included nine retrospective cohort studies comprising 910 patients with BM from CRC. Meta-analysis results showed no significant difference in OS between patients with synchronous and metachronous BM (HR, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.59-1.38; P=0.63). In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that the timing of BM development does not impact OS in patients with BM from CRC.

Oncology LettersVol. 29(5)
Jacobi Medical Center (US), Chi Mei Medical Center (TW), National Cheng Kung University Hospital (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Brain Metastases and Treatment
3.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.