Comparison of HISTO SPOT HLA AB With Cross‐Match Results

Single antigen bead assays have revolutionised the identification and definition of HLA-specific antibodies and HLA-specific antibody profiles present in patients awaiting transplantation are routinely characterised to inform organ allocation. For highly sensitised patients with a lower likelihood of finding a compatible donor, de-listing of unacceptable antigens is an option to release organ offers. In this study, 164 serum samples from 106 potential renal transplant recipients were tested using HISTO SPOT HLA AB in parallel with testing by LABScreen Single Antigen (One Lambda) and cross-matching by both CDC and flow cytometry. The results were analysed to assess the ability of HISTO SPOT HLA AB to predict a cross-match result and to understand the relative sensitivity of this test compared with other available assays. 136 samples analysed were positive for donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) using HISTO SPOT HLA AB. Of these, 17 (12.5%) were CDC positive, and 82 (60.3%) were positive by flow cytometry. A total of 28 sera which were negative for DSAs using HISTO SPOT HLA AB were negative by CDC and 25 (89.3%) were also flow cytometry cross-match negative. In this early study, HISTO SPOT HLA AB has a 100% negative predictive value for CDC and 89.3% for flow cytometry cross-matching. HISTO SPOT may therefore prove a useful additional tool to inform de-listing strategies and to facilitate transplantation in highly sensitised patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Immunogenetics
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/iji.12710
Primary Topic
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of HISTO SPOT HLA AB With Cross‐Match Results

Marcus Lowe, Mark Harris, Andrew Canterbury, Kay Poulton et al.
International Journal of Immunogenetics
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
article

Comparison of HISTO SPOT HLA AB With Cross‐Match Results

Marcus Lowe, Mark Harris, Andrew Canterbury, Kay Poulton, Judith Worthington, Marie E. Hampson
article en

Abstract

Single antigen bead assays have revolutionised the identification and definition of HLA-specific antibodies and HLA-specific antibody profiles present in patients awaiting transplantation are routinely characterised to inform organ allocation. For highly sensitised patients with a lower likelihood of finding a compatible donor, de-listing of unacceptable antigens is an option to release organ offers. In this study, 164 serum samples from 106 potential renal transplant recipients were tested using HISTO SPOT HLA AB in parallel with testing by LABScreen Single Antigen (One Lambda) and cross-matching by both CDC and flow cytometry. The results were analysed to assess the ability of HISTO SPOT HLA AB to predict a cross-match result and to understand the relative sensitivity of this test compared with other available assays. 136 samples analysed were positive for donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) using HISTO SPOT HLA AB. Of these, 17 (12.5%) were CDC positive, and 82 (60.3%) were positive by flow cytometry. A total of 28 sera which were negative for DSAs using HISTO SPOT HLA AB were negative by CDC and 25 (89.3%) were also flow cytometry cross-match negative. In this early study, HISTO SPOT HLA AB has a 100% negative predictive value for CDC and 89.3% for flow cytometry cross-matching. HISTO SPOT may therefore prove a useful additional tool to inform de-listing strategies and to facilitate transplantation in highly sensitised patients.

International Journal of ImmunogeneticsVol. 52(3)
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB), Manchester Royal Infirmary (GB), University of Manchester (GB), Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.